Home Featured Content

5 Glass-Half-Full Observations On M. Night Shyamalan

Is it more accurate to say that M. Night Shyamalan is a polarizing cinematic figure, or that he is just widely maligned? The director has gone from rising star to whipping boy to laughing stock in what feels like such a short time span, a popular film career that has gone on for not even 15 years. The promise of his early films such as The Sixth Sense and Unbreakable seems like a distant memory, and today his name evokes—despite rather consistent box office success—almost uniform critical derision.

[h2]4) In terms of pure story and plot points, he does decent work[/h2]

The Village

Recommended Videos

When I think about The Village in particular, I usually reflect fairly positively on the premise and the progression of the story. The characters in the abstract seem to work, and to draw out the story and the point of it all and everything. The storytelling in his earlier stuff presumably works as well on the page as it does on the screen. Signs progresses reasonably well, even if the ending is a bit of a letdown, though maybe it was merely undercut by some of the awkward staging of pivotal moments. Maybe he just doesn’t know what to do with the oddity that is Joaquin Phoenix, the way other directors have been able to somehow bring out his genius.

It’s just that when these characters and stories make their way to the screen and get assembled together in sequence, they somehow come out flat, usually awkward, sometimes downright farcical. There are a number of intangible aspects to direction that make the role so crucially important to a movie, and the same faults come up too often in Shyamalan’s work for it to be reasonably pinned on anybody else’s hand. As a writer though, despite dialogue that sometimes sounds like it’s out of a bad late night commercial, he may still be salvageable. In the best of all possible worlds.

Continue reading on the next page…