Doctor Who Review: “The Angels Take Manhattan” (Series 7 Episode 5)

angels take manhattan promo pics 23 1 thumb 550x310 101069 Doctor Who Review: The Angels Take Manhattan (Series 7 Episode 5)

One could argue that the final scenes at least tie back into Amy and Rory’s undying love for one another, but having these two sacrifice themselves or their happiness for each other is such a thoroughly ingrained part of who these characters are that it does not, to me, count as anything revelatory or insightful. Of course Amy would choose to be with Rory over the Doctor. That’s not a major character decision. It’s not a major step forward for Amy Pond. It’s a matter that was settled mid-way through her first season, and countless times since. Even considering how romance plays into the ending, it still comes across to me as a random, sudden conclusion.

The thing is, I think I could be perfectly okay with that if the last four episodes had prepped the chance nature of their exit as a thematic point. I kind of like the idea that Amy and Rory’s story could function as literary tragedy, where their affinity for time-travel and adventure – and their resulting inability to lead a normal life – is ultimately what does them in. The last four episodes had a real chance to hone in on this idea, and therefore make The Angels Take Manhattan seem more fitting in context. But Amy and Rory were barely seen in the first three episodes of the season, and The Power of Three hardly addressed the self-destructive nature of their actions at all. Thus, The Angels Take Manhattan stands on its own, building on not a single second of the last four hours.

That is why I will always prefer an exit like The God Complex provided. If major characters like these are going to go away forever, I want it to feel natural and organic. I want the show to build to this sort of moment, instead of plopping it down in one chosen episode. That does not mean I require a happy ending, but if there is going to be a sad ending, I want it to be earned. And this, to me, is where The Angels Take Manhattan fails.

I am especially perturbed by how quickly the episode wraps up. Amy lets the Angel zap her back in time, the Doctor finds and reads the afterward, and that’s it. I absolutely understand the need to tie this all back into the Doctor, as he is the main character, but it leaves me feeling unsatisfied, on both emotional and logical levels.

On the latter, I find it tough to fathom a scenario where Amy and Rory are sent back in time and simply start living their lives in peace. We kept seeing, throughout this season, that they had extreme difficulty staying away from the Doctor. How exactly would they adjust to these new circumstances and stay psychologically healthy? What would they do to fill the gap the Doctor left? I do not know, nor shall I ever know. This, of course, is the risk of ‘tragic’ endings; they open more doors than can ever possibly be closed, once again leading me to prefer the simple, open-ended nature of The God Complex.

On the emotional level, I wonder why we could not at least get a montage of Amy and Rory growing old together in the past. I could probably get past my logical issues were we given a small, visual confirmation that for these characters, life does indeed go on. Amy tells us as much in narration, but television is a visual medium, and one final shot of Amy and Rory together would have helped sell the impact of the ending.

It also would have rectified what may be my biggest beef with the ending: That the last shot we will ever see of Arthur Darvill in character as Rory Williams is the Angel blinking him back in time. No final line. No character denouement. Nothing. In the end, he’s just a piece of Amy’s story, and I think treating him as such displays a fundamental misunderstanding of what this character has become since he joined the main cast.

Continue reading on the next page…

PreviousNext
Hot Stories From Around The Web
  • Rosemary

    Colonel? I think you mean Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      Darnit! I can’t believe I disrespected the good Brigadier like that. Total brain slip. Thanks for pointing it out. It is now fixed.

  • Ben

    I disagree. You’re angry that they’re story ended abruptly. There was no build up. I think that was the point. The Doctor left them last season but couldn’t leave them forever. He kept coming back to them and that came back to bite him in the butt. The Ponds kept traveling with him under his trust only for him to fail again. The Ponds’ emotional arc was that they chose the Doctor life. And that lead to this. It was abrupt. And sudden. And that’s how it’s supposed to feel. They were ripped away from the Doctor. That’s what he and us as viewers were supposed to feel. And yes, we don’t know if they lived a happy life. But it’s open to us to figure out. We, like the Doctor, are to rely on Amy’s words. And hope that they lived happy. That’s the tragedy in it, that we don’t know for sure. Especially when River told her about not letting him know about the damage, she wouldn’t have written about it being bad even if it was. And that was the point, for us to feel just a bit unsure. Also there was the theme of the Doctor becoming darker due to being alone all the time as the Ponds were on and off, like River. And this I realized thru this episode is meant to lead into his need for a new companion so that he’s never alone. That was the other theme, he can’t be alone and should find someone else.

    The previous 4 episodes didn’t build up to this. It built up that they would stay with the Doctor and see more worlds, and that was the point. That a result of that led them to this abrupt end. And this provided more finality than the God Complex, while also ending it with them being together.

    • Taher Kathawala

      *their

  • Jacki Whitford

    I also disagree. In reality, people we love are taken from us by random acts of violence every day. I thought this episode was brilliantly done. Amy first met River when they encountered the angels, and Amy left River the same way. Like Sally Barrow, Amy lived loved (Rory) happily till then end of her days. I feel absolute joy in that Amy and Rory were able to live out their lives together. I was also happy to see that River is pardoned and free to travel the universe. I truly wish River Song had her own spinoff adventure show. That would be exciting and hilarious. The point driven home with every companion is that the Doctor should never travel alone. And that sets us up for the next companion.

    • Fredrick Beondo

      This may be a bit out of left field, but that whole ‘the Doctor should not travel alone’ first struck me with the ending arc of sorts of the Tennant era, after finally saving Donna Noble from having her mind implode and sending the Time War back to whence it came…’The Waters of Mars’, where he decides to save everyone because of his own self-obsessing ‘Timelord Triumphant’ and then the commander commits suicide rather than change history. You can see in Tennant that the Doctor realized he overstepped his bounds, and I attributed that to the idea that he hadn’t gone so long without a companion since he first arrived in the new series.

      It seems he needs a companion to give him an opposing viewpoint or at least someone to bounce his crazy ideas off of, and in their own way, I’d say Amy and Rory were combinedly the best companion the Doctor has ever had, because even they didn’t totally agree and their love was always just such a confusing issue for the Doctor, though in his own way he loved them so, else why would he fight the fact Amy was right that she HAD to let the Angel send her back to Rory, knowing full well there was no alternative?

      I won’t say it was the way I’d have liked to see them leave, even if in the end they did get what they always wanted, to be together until the end…now for Ms. Coleman, who I had hoped would come aboard as the poor space stewardess with the endless souffles who mistook herself for a Dalek because the Doctor would grab her before the crash, even if that meant resetting the end of Asylum and they all remember him again…

  • Dale

    I too respectfully disagree that there was no arc. Amy and Rory are two individuals more committed to each other than to any other option. We’ve seen this emerge throughout the series. As Amy says before jumping off the building, this is marriage. She won’t live without Rory. They love each other deeply and get to prove it. I gain some solace that they are back in another time TOGETHER. It doesn’t matter to them what point in time it is. And, due to the way the Angels zap people without erasing their current history, they and the Doctor get to keep their past experiences as we know them.

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jonathan-Lack/100000619690152 Jonathan Lack

      As I say in the article, that’s been done before. Doing the exact same thing Moffat and other writers have done with characters countless times before is not insightful or revelatory enough to be the final note, for me at least. To each their own.

  • Taher Kathawala

    I think Amy and Rory are strong characters… so important in the life of the eleventh doctor. The compassion he feels for Amy especially is unrivaled by any of his other incarnations with any of other companions. They may not be as iconic as other companions… but the relationship between Amy and the Doctor (and the rare conflicts with Rory) is forged from the relationship of a father and a daughter. Fiercely protective of each other, but also allowing a degree of freedom (while Rory feels the classic jealousy that a beta male may feel.)

    Their send-off IS too abrupt. It’s been built up in episode after episode… but, I dare to say. a, “two-parter,” may have been useful in this situation. Part 1, introduce the dilemma and put the characters in some sticky situations… early in part 2, begin finding solutions and towards the end sending Amy and Rory off… with a bang.

    The Weeping Angels were a great concept… but I must stress on the were. This episode was like a machine gun. Came in dilemma solution disappearance problem. As grammatically in-accurate that last sentence was, I think it captures how quickly the episode went by.

    I think Moffatt should have used a different concept for their send-off and saved the Weeping Angels for another day.

    On the plus side, the fact that it was a random act of violence on the part of the Weeping Angels shows that the Doctor was making the wrong judgement in coming back to take them on more adventures… deserting them (although leaving a person with an apartment and car is hardly deserting) may have been in their best interest. Moreover, it shows how people close to you may be ripped from you at any second and there’s nothing you can do about it. This brings the Doctor closer to the reality of human life and helps make him feel the sad difficulties that a regular human who doesn’t know the course of time feels.

    All in all… good, but could have been better.