The Newsroom Review: “I’ll Try To Fix You” (Season 1, Episode 4)

thenewsroom104 2 The Newsroom Review: Ill Try To Fix You (Season 1, Episode 4)

Taking its name from a Coldplay song and with the excellent Hope Davis guest starring, this week’s episode of The Newsroom sees the show truly getting into its stride. After viewing the first four episodes, I can safely say that this is truly becoming one of the must see shows on television. It’s not perfect by any means and this episode in particular shows just how good, and how bad it can be. There are better shows out there, that’s for sure, but for the pure entertainment of seeing this ensemble cast speaking Aaron Sorkin‘s dialogue, there truly is nothing better.

It starts out at ACN’s New Year’s Eve party and predictably romance is in the air. Jim and Maggie still won’t get it on because Don is still getting in the way, despite the fact that Maggie would rather be with Jim. They laugh, make each other smile and look at each other in alluring ways. But of course Don gets between them, drunk, and gives a possible date to Jim, thus thwarting Jim’s chances with Maggie yet again.

Mac also has been struck by Cupid’s fine arrow aim and seems to have fallen for Wade, from the DOJ, having moved on from the fiasco with Will. Will also tries to find love at the New Year’s party with a woman who turns out to be a gossip columnist named Nina Howard (Hope Davis), it all goes well until he gives her a lecture about her profession. Being offended, the following day she prints a story in the New York Post accusing Will of trying to grope her.

All of this stuff is rather amusing and charming, plus it lends humanity to the characters, but this isn’t anything we haven’t seen before. The Jim/Maggie office will-they-won’t-they thing is very old hat and it is all building to a moment where they share a kiss and we’re all supposed to whoop with joy. I don’t know if Sorkin is deliberately doing this or if he can’t think of another story to tell in the office. It’s the performances which perfectly play up the comedy of these scenes that allows them to work, but for Sorkin this is just so sloppy. It reminds us of when he was writing The American President, which was an entirely incidental and empty romantic comedy. This is not Sorkin’s forte.

As for continuing News Night’s new approach to delivering news, the first day into 2011 they intend to focus on stories that got little press throughout the year. One of these stories belongs to Maggie, who suggests that the “Obama’s trying to steal our guns” line, that was promoted by likes of Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin (right wing nut cases), was a lie. The potshots taken particularly at Glenn Beck’s expense are just beautiful, despite the fact that during this segment I couldn’t get the sight of Aaron Sorkin and Jon Stewart fist bumping behind the camera out of my head. Will McAvoy does go a little Daily Show, but that’s all good with me.

But then it’s more romance and the heavy eyelids set in again. Forgive me, but this show is called The Newsroom, hence it should be taking place in the newsroom. The West Wing was set wholly inside the west wing for the majority of its episodes and The Newsroom is best when dealing with getting the news out, reflecting real political issues (in itself a fairly bold move) and showing how that works. That was the great virtue of Sorkin’s work, he showed the workspace and made it fascinating, intricately laying out how that place functioned. With The Newsroom that’s not been the modus operandi as of yet, but that’s where the show’s great strength lies.

Click below to continue reading

Next
Hot Stories From Around The Web
  • http://shanx.com/ NearlyNormal

    What better shows are “out there”? Where? Big Bang, Met Your Mother, Bacholerette, Suits, or the dozen Dancing and Singing shows? Most of them are targeted at an adolescent demographic, which doesn’t help the dumbing down of the viewing audiences. The only show worth watching is from British TV, Line of Duty. Now that Borgias and Game of Thrones are done for the season, Newsroom is the crown jewel worth watching for discerning folks.

    • http://twitter.com/will_chadwick Will Chadwick

      Breaking Bad for one.

      • http://shanx.com/ NearlyNormal

        Yes Season 5 has just started and I’ll surely be glued. What else?

        • http://twitter.com/will_chadwick Will Chadwick

          In terms of current programming? On HBO alone there are better shows: Veep, Girls, Boardwalk Empire, Game of Thrones. AMC has Mad Men and The Walking Dead. Showtime has Homeland. In the UK there is stuff like Wallander, Walking & Talking and Blackout. All are more consistent than The Newsroom, I’m not saying it’s bad, I think I like it more than a lot of critics but its not the best of what TV has to offer at the moment

          • http://shanx.com/ NearlyNormal

            Veep is way too vapid and sporadic for anyone who has seen the original British show that inspired it, “The Thick of It”. Boardwalk Empire was a well produced show, but the subject matter became less interesting for most people after a few episodes, even with the gratuitous nudity. I already mentioned GoT and Mad Men, both of which are already finished with their current seasons (as is Borgias). Homeland season 1 is also gone already. I’m finding Newsroom’s episodes, just four of them so far, to be highly consistent and studded with very intelligent writing. Mad Men is well written and engaging too, and a fabulous soap, but it’s nowhere near as inspiring or laconic as Newsroom. Two different moods. Homeland was a thrilling one, and had it not been for the ability to watch it all in sequence, I wouldn’t have bothered with it. Newsroom will stand up to repeat viewings because of its writing. Homeland is a one-time story, once you know what happens, you know what happens. No charm of writing or anything. Just my personal opinion…

          • Danny Harper

            laconic? not a word I would use for this show. Newsroom is constantly spewing excessive dialogue that is too witty and cutting for its own good on topics that were interesting six months ago. I like Aaron Sorkins style but this show is too far up its own ass to be effective entertainment. Intelligent? yes. Pious, condescending, one-dimensional? yes as well. There are some interesting aspects, but you are giving it way too much credit. The supporting characters are flat and Jim is a completely unrealistic lead. The sad part of all this is the fact that I saw previews for this and thought it would be excellent. not the case. Maybe it will catch its stride, but right now there are way too many negatives to keep me as a viewer going forward.

            BTW, Mad Men and Breaking Bad are on a completely different level when it comes to television entertainment. I dont think they even should be compared, but yall started it.

          • http://shanx.com/ NearlyNormal

            Pious, condescending, one-dimensional are hardly words that spring to mind when I think of Newsroom. I suppose audiences always want pandering feel-good TLC. Sure it is scathing, to everyone, to all sides. And that’s engaging for many of us.

            I enjoy the other shows too because they are all spectacular productions. With the kind of drought we see in Hollywood, it’s great to see that TV shows have picked up. I can’t wait for BB’s season 5 that has just started!

          • http://shanx.com/ NearlyNormal

            Breaking Bad Season 4 and 5 btw have been full of episodes that could have and should have finished in 10 minutes because the story was just not there, but were somehow dragged on and on with slow storytelling. The first episode of Season 5 was a bit disappointing, to say the least.

            At least Newsroom has no dearth of things to say.

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/2UXJVLZFVBGP4Y4KP4TBZHC6UA Jenny

    I have been maintaining optimism for The Newsroom despite
    the loads of negative criticism that seems to be the majority vote. After
    reading your review, I am happy to see that I am not the only one out there
    that is rooting for the series. I must admit, however, that episode four left
    me fearful for how the rest of the season may play out. The prior episodes carried
    such substance as they boldly attacked our mainstream media and the flaws that
    exist within. I loved how it addressed controversial issues like that, which surely
    led to a slue of conversation around the office at Dish the next day. This
    Sunday’s episode carried no hard-hitting messages and only highlighted
    superficial plot points seen in every TV drama, like office sexual tensions and
    love triangles. I am curious to see where Sorkin takes the show from here, and
    already have next week’s episode set to record. Luckily, I have the Hopper DVR
    with a huge amount of recording space so, if The Newsroom does turn out to be the
    disappointment critics are hoping for, at least I didn’t waste precious memory
    on it. We’ll just have to keep our fingers cross that it lives up to the
    potential that it has already proven capable of doing.

  • Stonebridgez

    Lord knows, I want to like it. But honestly … soo predictable. The problems, as I see it: Old guy “mentor” just a little too old and feeble to be believably still functioning in a key role at a major news corporation. He’s like a cartoon – or is he the token senior (see Madmen) or is that Jane Fonda?. And the office romances – not one but TWO! The last time this plot line was interesting was Moonlighting. Dishevelled young brilliant newsguy, just a little to purposefully and carefully dishevelled. Young love interest – female, miscast. Not to be mean, but her acting is obvious and overstated, and face is common and uninteresting. And the dialogue – some characters can pull it off (see Will) and some cannot – (see girl who used to do skits on Daily Show). And the inconsistency … in one show everyone is afraid of Will and they walk on eggshells around him, on last night’s show these underling peons all throw water in his face as a hilarious prank – which he seems perfectly fine with. I agree, there’s not much out there so I will continue to watch, but it’s by no means a must see for me.