Johnny Depp in Spat with ACLU Over Legal Fees Following Trial
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Amber Heard and Johnny Depp
Amber Heard and Johnny Depp Getty Images Remix By Keane Eacobellis

Johnny Depp in spat with ACLU over legal fees following trial

The battle continues.

In the latest round of drama from the Johnny Depp / Amber Heard legal saga, the Pirates of the Caribbean is now refusing to pay the bulk of the legal fees that the American Civil Liberties Union has asserted the actor should cover.

Recommended Videos

The ACLU is seeking more than $86,000 in legal fees from Depp, as reported by Verify, over the preparation of documents. The non-profit argued the documents had to be prepared after they were issued subpoenas by Depp’s lawyers, and that “under New York law” they are entitled to be reimbursed.

Depp’s legal team, as you can imagine, has described the request as “not only exorbitant, unreasonable, but unsupported by New York law.” Depp’s team says the only amount the ACLU is entitled to receive from the Pirates of the Caribbean actor is a little over a thousand dollars for costs, according to the Law & Crime Network.

The ACLU also still has Amber Heard listed on their Artist Ambassador page at the time of writing. The non-profit released a blog post denying that they assisted Heard during the trial, despite Heard’s prior $3.5 million donation to the organization in 2016. “We do not write op-eds or offer ambassadorships in exchange for donations,” the ACLU wrote.

During the Depp/Heard trial, it emerged that the non-profit helped in the drafting of the Washington Post op-ed, which the entire defamation lawsuit centered around. The Washington Post has added an editor’s note to the original story, saying a jury found three statements in the piece to be defamatory. Heard’s legal team, however, reportedly plans to appeal the jury’s verdict.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Danny Peterson
Danny Peterson
Danny Peterson covers entertainment news for WGTC and has previously enjoyed writing about housing, homelessness, the coronavirus pandemic, historic 2020 Oregon wildfires, and racial justice protests. Originally from Juneau, Alaska, Danny received his Bachelor's degree in English Literature from the University of Alaska Southeast and a Master's in Multimedia Journalism from the University of Oregon. He has written for The Portland Observer, worked as a digital enterprise reporter at KOIN 6 News, and is the co-producer of the award-winning documentary 'Escape from Eagle Creek.'