‘The Batman’ Backers Would Much Rather See the Sequel’s Rumored Villain Go Full-Blown Fantasy
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via DC Comics

‘The Batman’ backers would much rather see the sequel’s rumored villain go full-blown fantasy

We demand a full-on mud monster!

Batman on the big screen has generally tried to stick to some form of realism. For the time, the Tim Burton movies were a relatively grounded take on the character, Christopher Nolan painstakingly explored what it would practically mean to be the Caped Crusader, and Robert Pattinson in The Batman was more of a crime drama than a superhero story.

Recommended Videos

Box office returns indicate this is a winning strategy, though there’s a huge swathe of more sci-fi and horror-themed stories that may not ever make it to live-action. That may change soon if the rumors about The Batman – Part II prove true, and we get Clayface as a villain.

In Batman: The Animated Series, he’s an amorphous clay monster who can constantly shift forms, almost like a grimier take on the T-1000. But, if he is going to make his live-action cinematic debut, fans are adamant they don’t want him to be toned down:

Does Pattinson’s Batman really have what it takes to deal with metahumans?

Comment
by from discussion
inDC_Cinematic

Let’s crack open the Batcave’s sci-fi closet!

Comment
by from discussion
inDC_Cinematic

We can only agree:

Comment
by from discussion
inDC_Cinematic

Maybe this is more of a route for The Brave and the Bold to go down:

Comment
by from discussion
inDC_Cinematic

Matt Reeves’ movies have always been fairly grounded, despite the fantastical subject matter, so perhaps he wouldn’t be keen on this:

Comment
by from discussion
inDC_Cinematic

We’d be surprised if it was anything other than the more realistic golden age Clayface:

Comment
by from discussion
inDC_Cinematic

With Ben Affleck and Michael Keaton apparently not sticking around for very long, it seems that sooner or later we’ll have two Batman franchises running simultaneously, with The Batman and The Brave and the Bold hopefully showing us distinctly different versions of the hero.

If that happens, expect the DCU’s Dark Knight to be the one dealing with the more bizarre and monstrous end of his rogues’ gallery, even if we can’t deny we really want to see Pattinson’s Bruce Wayne trying to deal with a rampaging mud man.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. I cover politics, weird history, video games and... well, anything really. Keep it breezy, keep it light, keep it straightforward.