Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
the little mermaid
Photo via Disney

‘The Little Mermaid’ is being nitpicked to death, but this one is actually worth getting irritated about

They lied straight to our faces.

No film is ever safe from the ruthless clutches of overly fussy critics, especially one as high-profile as The Little Mermaid, but considering the relatively caustic wringer it’s been put through since before it even dropped in theaters, the smaller grievances just seem that much more like overkill.

Recommended Videos

Of course, in no world does that mean The Little Mermaid is above honest critique, and as spectacular as that “Under the Sea” reimagining was, there’s one aspect about the film’s powerhouse musical number that simply can’t be forgiven.

As pointed out by one Peter Sciretta on Twitter, the song’s original lyrics remained unchanged in the jump to live-action; so, according to Sebastian, the newt still plays the flute, the carp still plays the harp, and the plaice, of course, still plays the bass.

But for all the effort they put into the number’s visual presentation, The Little Mermaid‘s team nevertheless neglected to have any of the undersea creatures actually play any instruments as they did in the original.

Is it a bit of a silly critique? Yes, but it’s also representative of a larger problem with The Little Mermaid, and with Disney’s approach to live-action remakes as a whole. Rather than using the gift of hindsight to craft a much, much better story than the animated originals, the approach to these do-overs seems to just be something along the lines of “take this older animated movie, make it bigger and louder, and maybe make the story a touch more acceptable if it isn’t already sufficiently so.”

So yes, “Under the Sea” may have been much more sensually dazzling than in the original movie, but it’s also worth considering that a bit of coherence was not only de-prioritized, but sacrificed in the process. We love you, Little Mermaid, but don’t think your shortcomings won’t spark a conversation or two.

The Little Mermaid is now playing in theaters.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte is a freelance writer for We Got This Covered, a graduate of St. Thomas University's English program, a fountain of film opinions, and probably the single biggest fan of Peter Jackson's 'King Kong.' She has written professionally since 2018, and will tackle an idiosyncratic TikTok story with just as much gumption as she does a film review.