Image Credit: Disney
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Procreate
Image via Procreate/Facebook

Procreate’s stance on generative AI, explained

Will Procreate be joining the AI bandwagon?

Recently design programs Photoshop, Illustrator, Canva, and CorelDRAW, have integrated generative AI to make processes more efficient and enhance users’ creativity. However, not everyone is joining the bandwagon, and digital painting art studio Procreate has made its stance clear on the AI war.

Recommended Videos

There’s been a significant interest in AI over the last few years, and while there are advantages to using it in various applications, many are concerned about its implications for society. In a study, artists were asked about their thoughts on AI and 74 percent believed that using AI-generated artwork is unethical, while 76 percent said that AI-generated content shouldn’t be called art at all.

James Cuda’s statement about generative AI

A new page on Procreate’s website explicitly states “AI is not our future.” The statement also stated that although machine learning has many advantages, it’s not the direction Procreate is heading toward.

“We’re here for the humans. We’re not chasing a technology that is a moral threat to our greatest jewel: human creativity.”

Furthermore, the page lists the company’s stance on other issues important to users, such as copyright and privacy. It states that any artwork created using Procreate will be owned by the user, and they do not have access to the art. Furthermore, they assure users that their activities are never tracked.

Procreate CEO James Cuda also released a statement explaining his firm stance on generative AI. Many Procreate users have been asking whether artificial intelligence features will be added to the app. In a short video posted to X, Cuda said, “I really f***ing hate generative AI.” He said he doesn’t like what AI is doing to the art industry and the artists, and because of that, he will never be integrating AI into any of their products. After all, they developed Procreate for humans to easily create art. Despite not knowing what the future of AI will be, Cuda said that he believes they are taking a step in the right direction.

Users applaud Procreate’s firm stance

The Procreate app was first released for the iPad in 2011, and it remains one of the top apps for the platform with more than 30 million users. Artists — both amateur and professional — commented on Cuda’s video, and the majority applauded Cuda for firmly supporting artists.

The bold move by Procreate’s CEO has impressed many, and other companies may follow. Ed Newton-Rex, the CEO of Fairly Trained — a non-profit that certifies generative AI companies for fair data practices — took to X and shared his opinion on the matter. “I suspect we’ll see more companies adopt this position. Not just for legal/ethical reasons (though those are big), but also because rejecting gen AI will be a signal of premium quality. In a world of AI-generated slop, platforms that keep themselves slop-free will stand out”.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jean Mendoza
Jean Mendoza
Jean has been a freelance writer since 2007 and has contributed to outlets such as Lomography, Inquisitr, and Grunge. Her expertise include true crime, history, and weird and interesting facts. Her spare time is spent listening to podcasts, reading books, and gaming.