Ghislaine Maxwell may take a huge step towards freedom today, Supreme Court now mulling her release – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Ghislaine Maxwell during The 2005 Wall Street Concert Series Benefiting Wall Street Rising Starring Rod Stewart at Ciprianis Wall Street in New York City, New York, United States. (Photo by Robin Platzer/FilmMagic) / U.S. President Donald Trump talks to reporters while hosting Republican Congressional leaders and members of his cabinet in the Oval Office at the White House July 20, 2020 in Washington, DC. Trump and his guests talked about a proposed new round of financial stimulus to help the economy during the ongoing global coronavirus pandemic. (Photo by Doug Mills/Getty Images)
Photos by Robin Platzer/FilmMagic / Doug Mills/Getty Images

Ghislaine Maxwell may take a huge step towards freedom today, Supreme Court now mulling her release

A legal technicality means she may soon be a free woman.

Jeffrey Epstein’s right-hand woman, Ghislaine Maxwell, may go to bed tonight with a big grin on her face. Since Donald Trump returned to the presidency she’s delivered a masterclass in manipulation and may be on the verge of walking out of prison with her convictions quashed as a free woman.

Recommended Videos

As you read this, the Supreme Court is currently holding its “long conference”, during which the justices are considering the appeals they’ll hear in the coming term beginning Oct. 6.

Among them is Maxwell, whose lawyers are arguing that she was unfairly charged as the non-prosecution agreement Epstein had with the government stated: “the United States also agrees that it will not institute any criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.” The issue is whether a binding agreement on behalf of the “United States” applies to all federal prosecutors or just that particular U.S. attorney’s office.

If the justices agree that this issue needs to be settled, Maxwell will be given a hearing date and, if she wins, she walks free, and there will be no retrial.

As good as a pardon

It’s unclear what her chances of freedom are, but given that Maxwell has already used her testimony to praise Donald Trump and claim he had no involvement in Epstein’s crimes in exchange for being transferred to a low-security prison, this may be a sneaky backdoor way of getting what amounts to a pardon.

Trump and his team know how politically damaging it would be for him to personally pardon Maxwell. However, if she knows where Trump’s skeletons are buried and could expose him with receipts as being directly involved in Epstein’s abuse, getting her released on a legal technicality would give him at least some wiggle room.

But make no mistake, Maxwell squirming to freedom on a technicality would be a crushing injustice to her many victims. It’s worth underlining that the victims’ testimony underlines that she directly participated in their abuse, and she remains the only person to have ever faced justice for his crimes.

Maxwell strolling through that prison gate, a smile plastered onto her face as she climbs into a waiting limousine, would be a slap in the face to anyone involved in the case and make a mockery of American justice. That said, under Trump 2.0, Lady Justice is already being dragged through the mud and given a pair of black eyes, so what’s one more indignity?


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. I cover politics, weird history, video games and... well, anything really. Keep it breezy, keep it light, keep it straightforward.