'Failed to identify a source of authority': Donald Trump humiliated as Supreme Court slaps down Illinois National Guard deployment – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
U.S. President Donald Trump departs from the stage after delivering remarks during an event at Mount Airy Casino Resort on December 9, 2025 in Mount Pocono, Pennsylvania. Trump discussed his administration's economic agenda and its efforts to lower the cost of living. (Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images)
Photo by Alex Wong/Getty Images

‘Failed to identify a source of authority’: Donald Trump humiliated as Supreme Court slaps down Illinois National Guard deployment

Fresh humiliation for Trump to enjoy over Christmas.

Donald Trump assumed he could rely on the Supreme Court to rubber-stamp whatever unconstitutional abuses of power he cooked up. But, in a heartwarming twist as Christmas rolls around, it seems there are actually limits to what the judicial branch will let him get away with.

Recommended Videos

Late yesterday, the Supreme Court ruled on whether Trump sending national guard troops to Chicago was legal. The result? 6-3 against Trump, with the judges backing a lower court ruling that Trump and his goons hadn’t come close to proving that the situation on the ground was so dire that lawfulness could only be preserved down the barrel of a soldier’s rifle.

As you might expect, the three most conservative justices – Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch – were the dissenters. But, in a surprising twist, two Trump-appointed justices – Brett Kavanagh and Amy Coney Barrett – both agreed that the national guard deployment was unlawful.

This is a huge blow to Trump’s ongoing plans to bully Democrat-voting cities into submission and blows a hole in his argument that the deployments are necessary to fight a largely fictitious crime wave sweeping major metropolitan areas.

No “danger of rebellion”

The Supreme Court confirms that the decision by US District Judge April Perry earlier this year was correct, in which she said there was no evidence that – as the Trump administration continues to insist – there was a “danger of rebellion” brewing in Illinois. It also underlined that, contrary to their arguments, the protests against ICE aren’t hindering their activities in any real way.

This ruling doesn’t simply affect the Illinois deployment though, it will also be used as a precedent in the many other ongoing legal battles across the nation over the president putting his troops on American streets. Right now, these aren’t going Trump’s way: a federal judge in Oregon permanently blocked that deployment, and a Tennessee state court ruled in favor of Democrats in a similar battle.

Trump himself is yet to comment on this ruling, though you can bet it’s going to put him in a sour mood over Christmas. The Supreme Court is stacked with conservatives! This wasn’t supposed to happen!


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. I cover politics, weird history, video games and... well, anything really. Keep it breezy, keep it light, keep it straightforward.