The Pokémon GO team finally removes bonus given to Jeffrey Epstein's island years ago – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Stephanie Keith and Getty Images

The Pokémon GO team finally removes bonus given to Jeffrey Epstein’s island years ago

It's beyond baffling why this was allowed to happen in the first place.

After years of baffling inaction, the company that now owns the wildly popular mobile game Pokémon GO, Scopely, finally removed the highly controversial PokéStop located on Jeffrey Epstein’s private island, Little Saint James. This move came following recent, extensive dumps of the nauseating Epstein files, which reignited massive public outrage. It’s honestly pretty incredible that this virtual landmark was allowed to exist for so long, especially considering the island’s horrific reputation.

Recommended Videos

For those unfamiliar with how the game works, PokéStops are critical landmarks where players can find items and catch Pokémon. Before Scopely purchased the app, Niantic owned Pokémon GO. During Niantic’s ownership, players of their various location-based games could submit their own “points of interest” using their real-world location data. These submissions would then go through an approval process to become official stops.

Sometime around 2020 or 2021, during the early years of the COVID pandemic, a user submitted a point for Little Saint James, which everyone now knows as Epstein Island. This is the island Jeffrey Epstein, a convicted sexual offender and human trafficker, used to host his terrible parties before his arrest, per Fox. What’s worse, the person who submitted the stop was clearly aware of the island’s nightmare reputation. Screenshots revealed that the photo used for this point of interest came directly from drone footage taken just before Epstein died in prison. This whole situation suggests the incursion was entirely intentional.

A PokéStop was on Epstein’s island for years

The fact that this stop made it through the approval process at all is truly concerning. While some users claim that fellow players reviewed and approved these points of interest, it still managed to stick around for years, even after fans started noticing it over a year ago. This isn’t part of the blacked-out files, but it is still a weird chapter in the life of a monster who kept having visitors.

The ownership of the app changed hands in May 2025 when Scopely closed a deal to buy the app from Niantic for a massive $3.5 billion. Even after the sale, the stop remained active until the public furor over the Epstein files finally convinced Scopely to take action and pull the plug.

Many fans are left scratching their heads, wondering exactly why it took so long for Niantic and then Scopely to remove such a clearly inappropriate location. As one Redditor, u/Cute-Beyond-8133, pointed out, “That’s one hell of a ‘mistake’ to make.” They added that by 2021, everyone already knew the basics of what had happened on that island. It’s hard to argue with that logic, especially since the stop was clearly added with malice.

The controversy has sparked a broader discussion among users about what kind of locations should be allowed in the game environment. Another user on Reddit, u/LostWoodsInTheField, suggested that the Pokémon GO team should make all super controversial locations completely void from the game, specifically mentioning the homes of pedophiles. They then added a related, if slightly sarcastic, follow-up: “Unrelated question. Completely unrelated. Is there one at the white house?”

Interestingly, some users didn’t just focus on the company’s slow response. A few people actually defended the developers, suggesting that at least they finally did something about the situation, which is more than certain governing bodies have done. “And just like that, they’ve taken more action than the DOJ,” remarked u/Critical_Cat_8162.

With Scopely now holding the data, some people are wondering if they could use the stop’s usage logs to gain insight into who might have visited that awful location. One user, u/This_guy_works, asked, “Maybe we can track who was on the island by who used the pokestop?” While that sounds like a fascinating, if dark, idea, it probably won’t pan out. Unfortunately, players can easily “spoof” their location to virtually “travel” to any stop without ever stepping foot on the island itself. It seems many players did just that to access the highly notorious Epstein Island PokéStop over the years. This whole episode is a bizarre reminder of how much real-world ugliness can seep into our digital spaces.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jorge Aguilar
Jorge Aguilar
Aggy has worked for multiple sites as a writer and editor, and has been a managing editor for sites that have millions of views a month. He's been the Lead of Social Content for a site garnering millions of views a month, and co owns multiple successful social media channels, including a Gaming news TikTok, and a Facebook Fortnite page with over 700k followers. His work includes Dot Esports, Screen Rant, How To Geek Try Hard Guides, PC Invasion, Pro Game Guides, Android Police, N4G, WePC, Sportskeeda, and GFinity Esports. He has also published two games under Tales and is currently working on one with Choice of Games. He has written and illustrated a number of books, including for children, and has a comic under his belt. He does not lean any one way politically; he just reports the facts and news, and gives an opinion based on those.