Ghislaine Maxwell, convicted of helping Jeffrey Epstein sexually abuse teenage girls, recently refused to testify before Congress, which is a shift from her previous cooperation. Instead, she offered a dramatic counter-proposal: she will reveal the “unfiltered truth” about the entire scandal, only if Donald Trump grants her clemency.
Maxwell’s attorney, David Oskar Marcus, made the pitch publicly, stating, “Ms Maxwell is prepared to speak fully and honestly if granted clemency by President Trump.” What’s truly attention-grabbing is that she specifically offered to clear the names of both Trump and Bill Clinton, claiming, “Ms Maxwell alone can explain why, and the public is entitled to that explanation.”
According to The Guardian, this proposal has been met with immediate and harsh condemnation from legal veterans and, most importantly, from the attorneys representing Epstein’s victims. One victim attorney called the entire clemency pitch “twisted,” casting major doubt on Maxwell’s motivations or ability to tell anything close to the truth.
Providing her with a pardon is an injustice to her victims
Defense attorney and former Los Angeles prosecutor RJ Drelling called the situation a desperate “game of chess” between Maxwell and the administration. He broke down the cynical trade: “Help me out, and I can help you. Don’t help me out, and maybe I can hurt you.”
Neama Rahmani, founder of West Coast Trial Lawyers, was equally blunt, saying that he found Maxwell’s proposal “distasteful, actually downright shameful.” Rahmani noted that since her Supreme Court petition was denied, she’s facing decades in federal prison, and this clemency pitch is clearly her easiest path out. Attorneys representing the victims certainly agree, calling it a manipulation.
Meanwhile, the Trump Administration has been dealing with political blowback for months over the handling of the Epstein files, so wading into this messy situation would be a major risk. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt addressed the issue, stating the topic is “not a priority” for the president. Leavitt added that when she last spoke to Trump, clemency for Maxwell was “not something he’s considering or thinking about.”
Even if the administration were to consider the offer, there are massive legal hurdles regarding the enforcement of conditional pardons. If one were granted, they can’t really go back if Maxwell’s testimony doesn’t meet expectations. Ultimately, John Day, one of the lawyers for the victims argue anything coming from Maxwell would be so “corrupt and tainted that it’s worthless.” He pointed out, “Her story is up for sale. There’s a price on it.”
I agree with them, that justice must come from following the trails of victim statements and unredacted documents, not by trusting a convicted felon.
Published: Feb 16, 2026 08:50 am