New Homeland Security Secretary just barely scraped by first round of nomination hearings - a Democrat betrayal made it possible – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 2.0.

New Homeland Security Secretary just barely scraped by first round of nomination hearings – a Democrat betrayal made it possible

Round one was far from a KO, but he’s on to round 2.

Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., just barely scraped through the first round of his confirmation journey to become President Trump’s next Department of Homeland Security (DHS) secretary. Fortunately for him, one Senate Democrat got him through what sounds like an explosive and, at times, pretty spicy hearing.

Recommended Videos

Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) was the sole Democrat on the panel to back Mullin, without whom Republicans would have faced a significant setback in their efforts to expedite Mullin’s confirmation. Per Fox News, Fetterman acknowledged his role as a potential difference-maker after the hearing, but said he came into the process with an open mind. Fetterman found his experience with Mullin to be “consistent and professional.”

This Democratic support was particularly crucial because a Republican, Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., who chairs the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, openly vowed not to support Mullin. Paul contended that Mullin was “unfit” for the role, citing Mullin’s refusal to apologize for a past comment where he allegedly said that an assault on Paul by a neighbor in 2017 was “justified.” 

Rand’s comments paint a hearing that would be better with popcorn

Paul argued that Mullin’s inability to apologize, coupled with a prior outburst during a hearing involving Teamsters President Sean O’Brien, demonstrated that he lacked the necessary mindset to lead DHS. Paul remarked that in a crisis, a “guy who brawls, a guy who can’t even say he’s sorry about wishing violence on me and really applauding the attack that happened on me” couldn’t, from his point of view, lead agencies like ICE or Border Patrol.

Mullin, for his part, directly addressed the criticisms during the hearing. He stated that if he had a problem with someone, he would tell them to their face. He also expressed his hope to prove to both Paul and the Senate Democrats on the panel that he was indeed the right pick for the job. Mullin promised to earn the job and not back down from a challenge. 

Mulling also committed to admitting when he’s wrong, saying, “I’m not perfect. I don’t claim to be perfect. I make mistakes just like anybody else. But mistakes, if you own them, you can learn from them and you can move ahead. And I’ll make that commitment to you.”

With the committee vote secured, Mullin’s confirmation now moves to the full Senate floor. He’ll only need a simple majority vote there to get the green light for the position. However, he’s likely to face more opposition from Senate Democrats who point to the ongoing fight over the DHS shutdown. On the Republican side, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., remains optimistic. 

So far, Mullin’s past relationship with a felon and the concerns about his stock portfolio haven’t really been a hurdle. However, as this proceeds, it’s going to be interesting to see how this plays out on the Senate floor.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz is a freelance writer who likes to use words to explore all the things that fascinate her. You can usually find her doing unnecessarily deep dives into games, movies, or fantasy/Sci-fi novels. Or having rousing debates about how political and technological developments are causing cultural shifts around the world.