A former vice president just went on record saying Donald Trump is being controlled by a foreign entity

It’s not every day you see a former vice president go on the record with such a sharp critique of a sitting administration, but that’s exactly what happened.

Kamala Harris, speaking at a Michigan Democratic Party luncheon, just lashed out at Donald Trump when discussing the current state of affairs and the military involvement in Iran. During the event in Detroit, she made it clear that she believes he was essentially steered into this conflict.

Per the Detroit News, the former Vice President stated, “He entered a war — got pulled into it by Bibi Netanyahu, let us be clear about that — entered a war that the American people do not want, putting at risk American service members.” This comment, which quickly gained traction on X, highlights a growing divide regarding the administration’s foreign policy. 

Harris went on to suggest that this entire military campaign is really just a way for the President to project an image of strength. She described Trump as “an insecure man” who is attempting to distract from the Epstein files, referring to the late financier Jeffrey Epstein. While Trump has denied being tied to any criminal wrongdoing regarding those files, critics continue to point to the handling of their release as a point of contention.

She isn’t alone in this thought process

The dynamics behind this conflict are complex. According to a report by Reuters last month, Netanyahu and Trump held a phone call less than 48 hours before the U.S.-Israeli strike on Iran began. While Trump has publicly maintained that the decision to strike was his alone, it seems that Netanyahu was an effective advocate. 

He framed the operation as a unique opportunity to eliminate Iranian leadership, particularly after intelligence suggested that a meeting of top Iranian officials had been moved forward. Netanyahu argued that this might be the best chance to avenge previous Iranian efforts to target Trump, including an alleged murder-for-hire plot from 2024. Netanyahu has also allegedly interfered with the ceasefire terms.

Harris isn’t just focused on international politics, though. She’s also pointing to the direct impact these decisions have on the average American, particularly when it comes to the economy. During her speech, she noted that the war is “jacking up the price of gas.” The numbers certainly back up the idea that energy costs are a major concern. 

As of Saturday, the national average price for unleaded gasoline hit $4.06 per gallon, a significant jump from the $3.84 seen just a month prior. In Michigan, the situation is similarly tight, with the statewide average for unleaded gasoline sitting at $3.85, while diesel fuel reached $5.22. It’s a tough reality for many families who are already feeling the squeeze on their budgets.

Beyond the critique of the war, Harris used the stage in Detroit to emphasize that for American women, the economy is the primary issue. She explained that all other concerns, including health and safety, are deeply connected to economic independence and the need for affordable childcare. 

The event itself was quite a gathering, featuring other prominent figures like U.S. Senator Cory Booker. Booker shared stories about people who inspired him and called for what he described as a “New Deal.” He urged the crowd to move from being a “hand” to a “fist,” encouraging them to get involved and make change happen rather than waiting for it. It was a high-energy moment for the roughly 300 people in attendance, who responded with a standing ovation.

Throughout the luncheon, other speakers, including Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson and Attorney General Dana Nessel, kept the focus on their opposition to the Trump administration. Benson spoke about her efforts to protect voting rights, while Nessel highlighted her history of filing lawsuits against the administration whenever she felt federal law or the Constitution had been violated.

The political atmosphere is heating up as we look toward future elections. With various candidates vying for party endorsements and the broader debate over foreign policy and economic health taking center stage, the rhetoric is only going to get more intense. 

Whether you agree with Harris’ assessment of the President’s motivations or you see the military action as a necessary step, the discourse surrounding the Iran conflict and its domestic consequences is clearly going to remain a big issue for voters for quite some time.