Trump tried to remove ‘partisan ideology’ from state parks, but Massachusetts judge just barred the order: ‘Dangerous precedent of censorship’ – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by Joshua Tree National Park, PDM 1.0.

Trump tried to remove ‘partisan ideology’ from state parks, but Massachusetts judge just barred the order: ‘Dangerous precedent of censorship’

The government “carries a responsibility to present history in full.”

Angel Kelley, a U.S. District Judge for Massachusetts, issued a preliminary injunction on Friday that mandates the National Park Service stop taking any further action to implement President Trump’s executive order to remove “partisan ideology.” This order was designed to remove descriptions that the administration believed disparaged Americans, but it resulted in the broad removal of historical context regarding civil rights, slavery, and climate change across the country.

Recommended Videos

Per the Washington Post, the administration has been systematically reviewing hundreds of materials across the national park system. In her 63-page order, Kelly stated that the policy “sets a dangerous precedent of censorship and sanitization.” She has given the federal government a strict 21-day window to restore and reinstall all interpretive materials that were altered, damaged, or removed as a result of the executive order.

The legal battle reportedly began in February when a coalition including the National Parks Conservation Association, the American Association for State and Local History, the Association of National Park Rangers, the Society for Experiential Graphic Design, and the Union of Concerned Scientists filed a lawsuit. They argued that the Interior Department ignored legal requirements in its attempt to overhaul the information presented to the public. 

The government has reportedly also removed signage featuring scientific fact

As reported by The Hill, Judge Kelley emphasized that the government carries a responsibility to present history in its entirety. “The Government’s stewardship of these park sites thus carries a responsibility to present history in full rather than in favored fragments. Unfortunately, the Government has disregarded these principles,” Kelley wrote.

The scope of these removals has been massive, impacting sites from the Grand Canyon to the Bunker Hill Monument. The full list can be seen in the National Security Archive. According to CBS, retired U.S. Park Ranger Lucy Scott expressed her frustration to the outlet regarding the removal of signage at Muir Woods, which had detailed scientific facts. 

She stated that the signage had explained that climate change reduced the fog, which was a necessary source of water for the redwood forests. She said, “The sign lived here happily for almost eight or nine years, and then the sign was taken down a couple weeks ago – ripped off.” The administration’s directive even led to the erasure of historical accounts regarding the contributions of women and Indigenous people at the site.

Inside the Independence National Historical Park in Philadelphia, signs detailing “historical truths” of George Washington’s ownership of nine enslaved people were also removed, leaving empty spaces where the panels once stood. Alan Spears, senior director for cultural resources at the National Parks Conservation Association, described the situation as an attempt to sanitize the American experience. 

“Some of that history might make people who are visiting these sites think critically,” Spears told CBS. “And I think that’s the concern from people on the side who want to restore ‘truth’ and ‘sanity.’ I think they just want a really sterilized experience for people when they come to places like national parks to learn. Sterilized, whitewashed, controlled, censored – all those words apply.”

The administration has defended its actions by arguing that it is simply trying to foster a more balanced narrative. However, the outlet reported that Brenda Hafera of the Heritage Foundation suggested that the focus should be on proportionality. “I think it’s very important that not everything is political,” she said, also tsting that a wildlife center should remain that.  

Former National Park System director Chuck Sams warned that these removals are “taking us back to a past that didn’t really exist.” He argued to CBS that the mission of these parks is to educate and illuminate, which requires using the best available scholarship rather than filtering content based on feelings.

“This ruling is from a liberal activist judge,” the Interior Department spokesperson Katie Martin told The Hill. “The Department will look at our appeal options while we celebrate UFC Freedom 250 on the South Lawn of the White House this weekend in honor of our nation’s 250th with the greatest president in the history of our country — President Donald J. Trump.”

The Washington Post noted that Judge Kelley stressed the importance of restoring these materials. “Because Defendants deemed it important to strip the parks of these undeniable truths in anticipation of the 250th Anniversary of our great Nation, it is equally important that our shared history be honestly told and fully restored by the 250th Anniversary to properly honor the remarkable achievements of the United States,” she wrote. 

As a part of this reframing, the Trump administration has also been restoring elements, like the previously destroyed Baltimore statue of “gallant, visionary man” Christopher Columbus.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz is a freelance writer who likes to use words to explore all the things that fascinate her. You can usually find her doing unnecessarily deep dives into games, movies, or fantasy/Sci-fi novels. Or having rousing debates about how political and technological developments are causing cultural shifts around the world.