Florida Republican candidate unveils OnlyFans crackdown, says 50% tax will protect men from ‘lust’

The Florida gubernatorial race is heating up, and the battle to succeed Ron DeSantis may be veering into unexpected territory — including debates over OnlyFans. James Fishback sparked online buzz after declaring that, if elected, he would impose a 50% tax on creators using the platform.

Fishback singled out popular creator Sophie Rain, tagging her directly and telling her to “quit or pay up.” The targeting wasn’t random. Rain has previously claimed that her income exceeds even that of LeBron James. Rain responded by saying she is a Florida native who had never heard of Fishback, dismissing him as “looking for clout.”

Hey @SophieRaiin,

Pay up *or* quit OnlyFans.

As Florida Governor, I will not allow a generation of smart and capable young women to sell their bodies online. https://t.co/1CGaAuohL1

— James Fishback (@j_fishback) January 13, 2026

Fishback is currently polling at just 1%, which helps explain Rain’s response. Still, long-shot candidates have defied the odds before. Zohran Mamdani, for instance, once occupied a similar polling position before winning his mayoral race. The difference, however, is that Mamdani’s campaign centered on a coherent and clearly articulated platform — unlike Fishback’s proposed 50% Onlyfans levy, which he has dubbed a “sin tax.”

“It is called a sin tax because it is a sin,” Fishback explained. The Republican hopeful said his goal is to deter online adult content creation, arguing that he would rather see young women become mothers raising children. He also claimed that platforms like OnlyFans are drawing young men away from Christian teachings and toward lust.

This proposal arrives amid reports that the Trump administration has granted O-1B visas to OnlyFans models for their “extraordinary abilities.” That development, combined with the administration instead celebrating the revocation of 8,000 student visas on Instagram, suggests Fishback may not receive the level of party support he expects — despite framing his proposal as a religious issue.

According to Yahoo!, Rain fired back forcefully. “First of all, imposing a tax on OnlyFans girls is quite possibly the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard of,” she said. “Second of all, you say this bill will be the ‘first of its kind.’ The second that bill gets on the Senate floor, it will be the ‘last of its kind.’ Go focus on doing your job.”

While OnlyFans creators have generated significant controversy in recent years — including instances of extreme or provocative content — the platform itself continues to post record earnings year after year. Targeting individual creators while saying nothing about the corporation enabling and profiting from the content is likely to confuse voters at best. At worst, it could render the proposed “sin tax” dead on arrival.

There is also the practical reality that OnlyFans is far from the only platform offering this kind of monetization. Creators could simply migrate elsewhere. Additionally, some creators on the platform reportedly do not engage in adult content at all, meaning enforcement would likely rely on self-disclosure. Crafting legislation that accounts for all these distinctions would be an uphill battle — and the odds of it being done effectively appear slim.

Still, this may be exactly the kind of controversy Fishback was aiming for. Sex work is a complex issue across the world, and while taxation could be a legitimate entry point into that conversation, it requires far more care and coherence than his proposal suggests.