If any American citizen thought the president of the United States is there to protect you, please buy a gun. Because he is doing everything he can to safeguard his people, but that doesn’t include you.
On Jan. 31, 2026, Donald Trump posted another lengthy rant on Truth Social addressing protests in Democratic-led cities. He announced that he has instructed the DHS to not participate in managing local protests unless state or city governments formally requested assistance. Oh, but they have to say “please,” as he writes. And that’s not even worst part of his post.
Trump also warned that that federal authorities would “very powerfully” protect federal buildings, courthouses, parks, and property. He announced that he had instructed ICE and Border Patrol to be “very forceful” in their operations. As if, they already haven’t crossed all limits. Yet, Trump’s language kept escalating.
Trump threatened “equal, or more consequences” on protesters
The president explicitly warned people against spitting at officers, punching or kicking “expensive” federal vehicles, or throwing rocks or bricks. Fair, nobody should be doing that. But “officers” should also not be threatening people to “erase” their voice, or worse, actually do that. Where’s the post about that, Don?
Trump followed up his warning with an ambiguous threat. He stated that anyone engaging in such acts would “suffer an equal, or more, consequence.” Do you mean, murder, Mr. President? Because “equal or greater consequence” is not a legal standard. It is not tied to arrest, charges, or judicial process. It is a retaliation framework that leaves it in the hands of federal agents to decide what constitutes an “equal” or “greater” response.
And we’ve already seen what they think is an equal response to anything even remotely discomforting to them. Notably, the post also described protesters as “lunatics,” “agitators,” “insurrectionists,” and “anarchists.” Just an inch away from calling them “domestic terrorists” and justifying their murder.
Trump explained his post, and made it sound worse
Later on the same day, aboard Air Force One, one reporter asked Trump to explain his post. The reporter specifically asked what he meant by saying people would suffer “equal or greater consequence.” But Trump’s response was even more threatening with one “I’m sorry” pushed in the middle.
Trump said that if protesters “do anything bad to our people, they will have to suffer.” He again condemned spitting in faces, punching “our soldiers” and “our patriots,” and throwing bricks at federal vehicles.
If they do anything bad to our people, they will have to suffer. I’m sorry. If they start spitting in peoples faces, punching Our soldiers, our patriots, they will get taken care of in at least an equal way.
Then, he bluntly reiterated that people acting against “his people” would be met with “very, very serious force.” Laughably, Trump framed these remarks as allowing officers to respond rather than being required to “stand there and take it.” Last time we checked, the side that’s been forced to stand there and take it were innocent civilians.
Trump is just protecting his people, and he don’t mean innocent citizens
Trump’s response to the reporter’s question was completely tied to a rhetoric of defending “our people.” But he leaves the whole of America of his definition. He repeatedly says he is protecting “our people,” and then refers to ICE officers, Border Patrol agents, soldiers, federal vehicles, and federal property.
Protesters, by contrast, are not framed as citizens exercising rights. He simply labeled them hostile actors interacting with state authority. What Trump is outlining is not simply protection of federal property. It is a redefinition of whose safety matters first. “Our people” are the agents of the state. Everyone else appears as a potential threat to be managed, deterred, or punished on sight.
Published: Feb 1, 2026 03:05 pm