A Controversial A-List Thriller Blasted, and Bombed Stirs the Pot All Over Again
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
rules of engagement
via Paramount

A controversial A-list thriller that was buried, blasted, and bombed stirs the pot all over again

Time may have been kinder to the hot-button film than people were at first.

Based entirely on the sum of its star-studded parts, expectations were very high heading into the release of blockbuster thriller Rules of Engagement in April of 2000, but the end result was a colossal letdown on a number of levels for a variety of different reasons.

Recommended Videos

Directed by Academy Award-winning The Exorcist and The French Connection legend William Friedkin, the script marked the screenwriting debut of Stephen Gaghan – who would win an Oscar of his own for penning Steven Soderbergh’s Traffic, which hit theaters only eight months later.

In front of the camera, heavyweights Samuel L. Jackson and Tommy Lee Jones headlines a cast that also featured Ben Kingsley, Guy Pearce, Bruce Greenwood, and many more, with the $60 million budget and timely thematic inspirations painting the picture of an intelligent, complex, crowd-pleaser.

rules of engagement
via Paramount

Instead, Rules of Engagement came under huge fire for its borderline offensive storytelling, with the American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee calling it “probably the most racist film ever made against Arabs by Hollywood”, although Friedkin would refute those claims in favor of branding his feature as being “jingoistic” instead.

In this instance, the controversy did not create cash, with the film tanking hard after shifting just $71 million in tickets, yielding a big loss for studio Paramount. However, more than 20 years on from its release, and the polarizing exploration of a Marine veteran being put on trial for a rescue mission gone horribly awry continues to stir up the conversation, with Redditors weighing up the pros and cons of the contentious film.

The performances remain solid, but there’s an air of unease in some of the sentiments and points being made by the characters that are even more galling given how much the world has changed in the last 22 years, leaving Rules of Engagement as little more than a forgotten footnote in the history of cinema.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Scott Campbell
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves: Words. Lots of words.