Should Avengers: Endgame Bring Back Erik Killmonger? – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Killmonger in Black Panther

Should Avengers: Endgame Bring Back Erik Killmonger?

With a few exceptions, the MCU isn't generally known for its memorable villains, so when a big bad like Black Panther’s Erik Killmonger comes along and leaves a profound impression on audiences, the question is raised of whether Marvel Studios should capitalize on the character’s strong reception and make him more than just another one-movie antagonist. Sure enough, in a new piece from CinemaBlend, the pros and cons are weighed on the idea of Avengers: Endgame bringing Michael B. Jordan back for another round.
This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

With a few exceptions, the MCU isn’t generally known for its memorable villains, so when a big bad like Black Panther’s Erik Killmonger comes along and leaves a profound impression on audiences, the question is raised of whether Marvel Studios should capitalize on the character’s strong reception and make him more than just another one-movie antagonist. Sure enough, in a new piece from CinemaBlend, the pros and cons are weighed on the idea of Avengers: Endgame bringing Michael B. Jordan back for another round.

Recommended Videos

On the pro side, the most obvious point is surely that audiences liked Killmonger, and would therefore appreciate seeing more of him. After all, it’s rare for the Marvel universe to bring us a villain who earns this much viewer sympathy, and if the likes of Thanos and Loki can live through multiple projects – and in the case of the latter, multiple supposed deaths – then why not Erik? And with Endgame already set to reverse some deaths, perhaps the Russo Brothers can find a way of resurrecting this fan favorite.

Nonetheless, the CinemaBlend piece makes a strong case for why it might be best to leave Killmonger’s story as is. For one thing, though Loki’s various fake deaths seem consistent with his mischievous nature, bringing back N’Jadaka may come across as a betrayal of the character and his choice of death over imprisonment, while also reducing the emotional impact of his arc’s conclusion.

What’s more, now that Wakanda has opened itself up to the world and started helping underprivileged children and families around the planet, it’s argued that Erik would have less reason to continue his vendetta against T’Challa, since the leader has essentially incorporated some of Killmonger’s ideas into the way he governs the nation. With that in mind, to bring the character back as a villain would possibly require changing his motivations, potentially losing that sympathetic element that once made him s0 popular in the process.

Of course, regardless of which side of the debate you lie on, the matter is all very hypothetical for the time being, but we’ll find out if Marvel Studios has such a retcon in mind when Avengers: Endgame hits theaters on April 26th, 2019.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author