Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Charlize_Theron_Kerry_Washington_The_School_for_Good_and_Evil
Image via Netflix

Critics aren’t finding Netflix’s lavish new fantasy to be very magical

A picturesque set design doesn't always cut it.

There was perhaps no pipeline more prominent in the early 2010s entertainment industry than the young adult fantasy novel-to-feature film or film franchise pipeline; with the likes of Twilight and The Hunger Games etched firmly into our brains for better or worse, such adaptations may not be the dominant force they once were, but continue to be a mainstay in our collective subconscious.

Recommended Videos

Fast forward to the early 2020s, and Netflix has decided to make a splash of its own with The School for Good and Evil, a fantasy film based on Soman Chainani’s 2013 novel of the same name. The film follows two best friends, Sophie, a beloved and beautiful girl who seems destined for princesshood, and Agatha, who frequently finds herself getting targeted by villagers who think she’s a witch, as they’re kidnapped and dropped off at the titular School for Good and Evil, which trains the next generation of fairytale heroes and villains. When the girls find themselves on opposing sides of the student body, their friendship is quickly put on the line.

Unfortunately, the critical praise received by its source material doesn’t seem to be replicated for the film adaptation; despite seeming to hit the mark with audiences, sitting at a toasty 84 percent approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes, critics have taken much less of a liking to it, with a more precarious 50 percent approval rating.

Variety‘s Peter Debruge wrote the film off as a haphazard attempt to rip off the Harry Potter films, resulting in an end product that’s rather hollow.

“Unlike Hogwarts, where fresh surprises lay waiting around every corner, this school seems to exist in concept only — and not a particularly good one at that.”

David Rooney of The Hollywood Reporter was equally critical, noting how the lavish set design and costumes fail to hide what’s ultimately a creative wasteland.

“Still, this is a uniquely tiresome slog — madly over-plotted, thuddingly derivative, insanely overlong and slathered in a big symphonic score that strives to infuse momentum into a saga with minimal emotional stakes.”

And Digital Spy‘s Ian Sandwell lamented the film’s own self-squandering for the sake of world-building that may not even happen now.

The School for Good and Evil is an exposition-heavy two hours-plus of set-up, intended to lay the foundations for the inevitable sequels, that forgets to be a compelling movie in its own right.”

Looking to come to your own conclusions? The School for Good and Evil is currently available to stream on Netflix.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte Simmons
Charlotte is a freelance writer for We Got This Covered, a graduate of St. Thomas University's English program, a fountain of film opinions, and probably the single biggest fan of Peter Jackson's 'King Kong.' She has written professionally since 2018, and will tackle an idiosyncratic TikTok story with just as much gumption as she does a film review.