Dame Judi Dench Doesn't Think Kevin Spacey Should've Been Cut From Recent Film – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Actor Kevin Spacey arrives at the 86th Academy Awards in Hollywood

Dame Judi Dench Doesn’t Think Kevin Spacey Should’ve Been Cut From Recent Film

Judi Dench recently defended Kevin Spacey at a film festival in Spain, arguing that he shouldn't have been cut from 2017's All the Money in the World.
This article is over 7 years old and may contain outdated information

You know, they say life never imitates art in a good way (at least, I do) and once again, this has been proven true.

Recommended Videos

While speaking at a film festival in Spain, Dame Judi Dench (whose character M once called James Bond a “sexist, misogynist dinosaur, a relic of the Cold War”) actually defended Kevin Spacey and seriously argued that he should not’ve been cut from 2017’s All the Money in the World after several allegations of inappropriate sexual behavior surfaced against the actor.

Here’s what Dench had to say:

“I can’t approve, in any way, of the fact – whatever he has done – that you then start to cut him out of films. Are we to go back throughout history now and anyone who has misbehaved in any way, or has broken the law, or has committed some kind of offense, are they always going to be cut out?”

Now, to be fair to the actress, historical revisionism in certain contexts is concerning (think of what George Lucas did with the original films in his initial Star Wars trilogy), but ultimately, it’s the creator’s call to make or that of the community which houses a piece of art or creation. If a movie’s due to be released and an actor needs to be replaced, a director should be allowed to swap them out. It’s their right.

On a related note – and this gets into Confederate statues territory here, so crazy people, start typing your angry letters now – it’s fine to get rid of a performance from a firmly established historical work if people want it gone. As long as another copy exists somewhere or we have a detailed record of someone initially being in a piece, why can’t we cut out the bad apples?

Ultimately, at the end of the day, the debate comes down to this. If someone behaves poorly, they should be removed from creative projects they’ve had a role in. Art’s not a firm and final thing, it can be tinkered with and updated at any time if a creator wants to and erased if a community wants it gone. As long as you keep some record of it somewhere for future generations, then go nuts and update films and remove monuments as you please. It’s really not a big deal.

What do you think, though? Is Judi Dench right to defend Kevin Spacey, or were you happy to see him removed from All the Money in the World? Take to the comments section and let us know.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Evan J. Pretzer
Evan J. Pretzer
A freelance writer with We Got This Covered for more than a year, Evan has been writing professionally since 2017. His interests include television, film and gaming and previous articles have been filed at Screen Rant and Canada's National Post. Evan also has a master's degree from The American University in journalism and public affairs.