Darren Aronofsky On How His Batman Would've Differed From The Dark Knight Trilogy – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Darren Aronofsky On How His Batman Would’ve Differed From The Dark Knight Trilogy

In the eight years separating Batman & Robin from Batman Begins, there were several possible movies featuring the Caped Crusader that came incredibly close to seeing the light of day following the studio cancelling Joel Schumacher's Batman Unchained. Among them were the likes of Batman: DarKnight, Batman Beyond and even Batman vs. Superman (yes, Warner Bros. had attempted to make it a reality long before 2016), each of which I could discuss factoids pertaining to for hours.
This article is over 7 years old and may contain outdated information

In the eight years separating Batman & Robin from Batman Begins, there were several possible movies featuring the Caped Crusader that came incredibly close to seeing the light of day following the studio cancelling Joel Schumacher’s Batman Unchained. Among them were the likes of Batman: DarKnight, Batman Beyond and even Batman vs. Superman (yes, Warner Bros. had attempted to make it a reality long before 2016), each of which I could discuss factoids pertaining to for hours.

Recommended Videos

But one in particular that gets brought up to this day is that of Batman: Year One. Believe it or not, Darren Aronofsky was set to adapt Frank Miller’s classic arc exploring the icon’s origins at one point – and with the lauded comic book scribe serving as screenwriter, no less.

While recently appearing on Empire Magazine’s podcast, The Playlist, Aronofsky spoke of how his vision was rejected, with WB eventually giving the green light to Christopher Nolan’s Batman Begins:

“Me and Frank Miller worked on a couple of scripts. We worked together on a couple of scripts, yeah.

…I think Nolan’s version is exactly what the studio wanted. I think I was much more of a gritty feel is what we were going for. Eventually I got to make ‘The Fountain,’ that was the film I really wanted to make. I just chose to pursue that.”

Being someone who’s had the fortune of reading one of Miller’s drafts, I can say that if Batman: Year One debuted in theaters, it would’ve most assuredly been R-rated. Mature as Nolan’s Dark Knight Trilogy was, WB was still able to sell obscene amounts of merchandise pertaining to it, toys included. Suffice it to say, Miller and Aronofsky’s pill-popping Bruce Wayne wouldn’t have been able to do the same.

Admittedly, this isn’t the time for me to dissect what I read ages ago, but it may still be possible for you to find said draft for Batman: Year One online. If you do, be forewarned that, despite being penned by Miller himself, the movie would’ve been much, much different than the comic book you love. Heck, Gordon’s first name was even changed from “Jim” to “Dave”!

But hey, at least we did receive the animated movie back in 2011, and that was an incredibly faithful adaptation. I guess we still won in the end, eh?


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy