Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Ghostbusters

Ghostbusters 3 Said To Be Scary, May Re-Use Old Footage

Ghostbusters 3 director Jason Reitman assures us that Ghostbusters 3 will be scary, and also reveals some unseen dailies from the 1984 original.
This article is over 5 years old and may contain outdated information

Ghostbusters 3 is shaping up to be quite the revival. After the deeply disappointing Ghostbusters (2016) (which was crappy for reasons entirely unrelated to the genders of the leads), there’s a sense that this is the franchise’s chance to prove it’s got what it takes. Up until now, all we’ve seen is an enigmatic teaser trailer and a plot description about a family moving back to a small town, but director Jason Reitman appeared at last weekend’s Ghostbusters Fan Fest where he dropped some very intriguing hints about what’s to come.

Recommended Videos

One of the most reassuring was when he explained that “I want to scare children.” While the 1984 original is generally considered a comedy, I remember watching it when I was a kid and the librarian ghost scene scared the bejeezus out of me (as did the Terror Dogs). One of the many reasons the 2016 reboot didn’t work was that it leaned way too far into bad comedy, with the ghosts never being taken particularly seriously.

But there’s another very interesting development revealed in this panel, with Reitman also saying the following:

“In making this movie, we found something kind of extraordinary. We went to Sony, and we said, ‘We’d really love to get back into the original dailies from 1984. Do you still have them?’ And we found them. They were in a mine in Kansas, and we shipped the boxes to Burbank. We’ve been going through the footage for reasons I cannot tell you, but along the way we found some really cool stuff.”

Now, leaving aside the awesomeness of there being a Kansas mine full of Ghostbusters dailies, what possible reason could Reitman want these for? My bet is that the film may feature members of the classic team with a bit of CGI de-aging applied to them.

Nick Fury in Captain Marvel proved that this technique can be used throughout a movie, and if they were going this route, the multiple hours of dailies will give the artists the reference material they need in order to bring Stantz, Venkman and Zeddemore back…and maybe Spengler if they can be absolutely sure they can do it tastefully.

We should find out very soon, as more of Ghostbusters 3 will no doubt be revealed over the coming months. Either way though, I hope we get to see some of this unseen footage ourselves. There’s a tiny bit here in this video (at 1:20) and it’s awesome, but I really want it all.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. Love writing about video games and will crawl over broken glass to write about anything related to Hideo Kojima. But am happy to write about anything and everything, so long as it's interesting!