The Hangover Part II Release May Be Halted
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

The Hangover Part II Release May Be Halted

The Hangover Part II may not see the light of day on May 26th, at least not if tattoo artist S. Victor Whitmill gets his way. THR is telling us that Whitmill, the man who designed the tattoo on Mike Tyson's face, which is the same tattoo that Ed Helms' character Stu has on his face, is suing Warner Bros. Apparently Whitmill holds a trademark on the design and he's asking for an injunction to stop Warner Bros. from releasing the movie. According to a document from the lawsuit, Warner Bros. didn't get permission from Whitmill to use the design.
This article is over 14 years old and may contain outdated information

Recommended Videos

The Hangover Part II may not see the light of day on May 26th, at least not if tattoo artist S. Victor Whitmill gets his way. THR is telling us that Whitmill, the man who designed the tattoo on Mike Tyson’s face, which is the same tattoo that Ed Helms‘ character Stu has on his face, is suing Warner Bros. Apparently Whitmill holds a trademark on the design and he’s asking for an injunction to stop Warner Bros. from releasing the movie. According to a document from the lawsuit, Warner Bros. didn’t get permission from Whitmill to use the design.

When Mr. Whitmill created the Original Tattoo, Mr Tyson agreed that Mr. Whitmill would own the artwork and thus, the copyright in the Original Tattoo. Warner Bros. Entertainment, Inc.—without attempting to contact Mr. Whitmill, obtain his permission, or credit his creation—has copied Mr. Whitmill’s Original Tattoo and placed it on the face of another actor…This unauthorized exploitation of the Original Tattoo constitutes copyright infringement.

Likely Warner Bros. will pay a big cash settlement to make the whole thing go away and still have the film keep its original release date. Still though, it’s just a pesky annoyance and Whitmill is clearly just looking for money. Does he really deserve it though? I mean ya, it’s his design but it’s really just being used as a parody. What do you think?


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Matt Joseph
Matt Joseph
Matt Joseph is the co-founder, owner and Editor in Chief of We Got This Covered. He currently attends the University of Western Ontario and is studying at the Richard Ivey School of Business. He works on We Got This Covered in his spare time and enjoys writing for the site.