Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Jake Gyllenhaal Batman

Jake Gyllenhaal Says He Won’t Replace Ben Affleck As Batman

Despite all the rumors and speculation surrounding the situation, Jake Gyllenhaal says he won't replace Ben Affleck as Batman.
This article is over 6 years old and may contain outdated information

Jake Gyllenhaal, Caped Crusader?

Recommended Videos

We’d certainly be into the idea, and as you surely know, the 37-year-old star, who is perhaps best known for Donnie DarkoNightcrawler and Brokeback Mountain, for which he was nominated for an Academy Award, has come into contention as a potential replacement for Ben Affleck.

The Batman actor is said to be eyeing the exit door as Warner Bros. shuffles its deck in preparation for a world beyond Justice League, and though it’s yet to be confirmed outright, Gyllenhaal (or Mad Men alum Jon Hamm, perhaps?) has been tipped to succeed Affleck as Gotham’s Dark Knight.

But according to Jake, at least, it’s not going to happen. Speaking to CNA Lifestyle, the actor was asked point blank if he’d be replacing Ben, to which he said: “The answer to that question is no.” Doesn’t get more clear cut than that, right? Of course, there’s always the chance that Gyllenhaal is sworn to secrecy and trying to downplay the speculation, but for now, we’re going to assume that he won’t be stepping into the Caped Crusader’s shoes.

That being said, if this does turn out to be a ruse on the actor’s part, and he is indeed in talks to play Batman, I don’t think many people would complain. Having already been in the running for the role in Christopher Nolan’s The Dark Knight Trilogy, you could argue that it’s not too late for him to be cast, as he’d be of decent age for at least a three-film run.

Sure, it’ll take some getting used to should he end up stepping into the DCEU to replace Ben Affleck, but it could work. Superhero roles have been recast before, of course – just look at Marvel’s decision to replace Terrence Howard with Don Cheadle in time for Iron Man 2 – though none quite on this level.

Either way, it’ll probably be a while before we hear anything concrete in regards to who’ll be donning the cape and cowl when we see the character on the big screen again, as The Batman is yet to nail down an official start date (though it could begin production in 2019). From what we understand, Matt Reeves has been given full creative license over the Caped Crusader’s upcoming solo mission, indicating that the beloved hero – regardless of whether it’s Gyllenhaal, Hamm or Affleck – won’t be ready to take flight until 2020.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Matt Joseph
Matt Joseph
Matt Joseph is the co-founder, owner and Editor in Chief of We Got This Covered. He currently attends the University of Western Ontario and is studying at the Richard Ivey School of Business. He works on We Got This Covered in his spare time and enjoys writing for the site.