Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Gun Media

Jason Voorhees slices into your DMs in New Line Cinema’s ‘Friday the 13th’ tease

Jason Voorhees strikes again.

Just a week after the original Friday the 13th director teased what appeared to be a long-awaited 13th installment to the franchise, movie studio New Line Cinema is already hinting at what very well may be the horror icon Jason Vorhees’ return to cinema screens.

Recommended Videos

In a tongue-in-cheek Instagram post, the movie studio posted a photo of a phone lock screen with a notification that “Jason Voorhees Wants to send you a message.”

“Uh oh. What do you think Jason Voorhees wants?” New Line Cinema captioned the post.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Ch-SvR9pRnY/

The number 13 has proved to be serendipitous indeed, as that is also how many years have passed since the previous installment in the franchise, with 2009’s reboot attempt Friday the 13th.

Following a messy and lengthy court battle between original Friday the 13th director, Sean Cunningham, and the 1980 film’s screenplay writer, Victor Miller, over various rights issues, it would appear the pair have worked out some kind of agreement to finally let a follow-up film proceed after development stagnated during the course of the legal proceedings.

This latest social media tease comes after Cunningham’s bio was updated on Cameo to include that a 13th Friday the 13th installment is “scheduled for next year.”

Though a judge ultimately ruled that Miller owns the rights to the original movie’s screenplay, Cunningham still retains “the character of adult Jason Voorhees,” according to Bloody Disgusting.

When you consider that the killer in the first film was actually Jason’s mother, it makes total sense that the hulking hockey mask-wearing character who became the main antagonist as the adult Jason in future installments — for movies that were not penned by Miller — would be considered a different piece of intellectual property entirely.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Danny Peterson
Danny Peterson
Danny Peterson covers entertainment news for WGTC and has previously enjoyed writing about housing, homelessness, the coronavirus pandemic, historic 2020 Oregon wildfires, and racial justice protests. Originally from Juneau, Alaska, Danny received his Bachelor's degree in English Literature from the University of Alaska Southeast and a Master's in Multimedia Journalism from the University of Oregon. He has written for The Portland Observer, worked as a digital enterprise reporter at KOIN 6 News, and is the co-producer of the award-winning documentary 'Escape from Eagle Creek.'