No Time To Die Star Says James Bond Needs A Radical Change

As one of the most enduringly popular franchises in the history of cinema, James Bond is no stranger to reinvention. Each recasting and reboot is obligated to move with the times in order to remain relevant, something that's been a key part of the brand's continued appeal since 1962's Dr. No.

As one of the most enduringly popular franchises in the history of cinema, James Bond is no stranger to reinvention. Each recasting and reboot is obligated to move with the times in order to remain relevant, something that’s been a key component of the brand’s continued appeal since 1962’s Dr. No.

Recommended Videos

The Daniel Craig era saw 007 updated as a very modern kind of action hero, which was influenced by the espionage genre finding newer, more relatable and deeply flawed icons like Jason Bourne and Jack Bauer, with the quip-happy and gadget-heavy adventures for MI6’s top operative viewed as relics of a distant time.

No Time to Die will be drawing the latest iteration of the iconic character to a suitably epic and spectacular conclusion, and then the speculation will turn to what comes next. In a new interview with Variety, Q actor Ben Whishaw offered his opinion that the property is in need of something radical to keep propelling it forward.

“If they want to continue with this character and the franchise, I think you can explode it and do anything. I don’t know what that should be, but it seems to me like it should be something quite radical, something really different. It’s got to change; it’s got to keep changing. We’re in different times now. There will always be people who want it to stick to the way it was whenever ago, and they’re important, because they love these films. But I think you can do both. You can honor the character and the tradition, and you can push it forward, too. And I think you have to, if it’s not just going to become a kind of museum piece.”

Whatever happens in the immediate future of James Bond has been given a very interesting new wrinkle following Amazon’s acquisition of MGM, which sees the multimedia monolith holding a vested stake in the series. The producers are confident the future remains exclusively on the big screen, but there’s going to be some intense discussions behind closed doors over how to proceed once the dust settles on No Time to Die.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more
related content
Read Article Which Disney character am I based on my Zodiac sign?
Aladdin/Elsa/Tiana
Read Article 5 years later, Marvel may have just stumbled upon the perfect ‘Avengers: Endgame’ follow-up, thanks to ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’
Deadpool and Wolverine overlaid on a green-hued panel from Avengers vs. X-Men
Read Article Who is Azazel in ‘Deadpool 3’?
Jason Flemyng as Azazel in X-Men: First Class
Read Article Does Caesar Die In ‘War For The Planet Of The Apes’?
Read Article Is ‘Deadpool 3’ in the MCU?
Deadpool 2
Related Content
Read Article Which Disney character am I based on my Zodiac sign?
Aladdin/Elsa/Tiana
Read Article 5 years later, Marvel may have just stumbled upon the perfect ‘Avengers: Endgame’ follow-up, thanks to ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’
Deadpool and Wolverine overlaid on a green-hued panel from Avengers vs. X-Men
Read Article Who is Azazel in ‘Deadpool 3’?
Jason Flemyng as Azazel in X-Men: First Class
Read Article Does Caesar Die In ‘War For The Planet Of The Apes’?
Read Article Is ‘Deadpool 3’ in the MCU?
Deadpool 2
Author
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves; Words. Lots of words.