Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
ant-man and the wasp quantumania
Image via Marvel Studios

‘Quantumania’ writer defends Kang’s underwhelming introduction that’s left Phase Five with a lot of work to do

Jonathan Majors delivered, but Kang the Conqueror didn't.

The hits just keep on coming for Ant-Man and the Wasp: Quantumania, with the 31st installment in the Marvel Cinematic Universe following up its unwanted critical reactions to start setting new lows for the franchise – and the superhero genre in general – at the box office.

Recommended Videos

Obviously, this isn’t what director Peyton Reed, writer Jeff Loveness, chief creative officer Kevin Feige, or any fans imagined or wanted when the hype train was powering straight ahead at full speed, with the overwhelmingly apathetic response to the Phase Five kickoff leaving the rest of the Multiverse Saga with an awful lot of work to do.

Jonathan Majors may have delivered as Kang the Conqueror performance-wise, but the same can’t be said about the character. After being ominously teased by everyone on either side of the camera as a formidable threat, the Multiverse Saga’s big bad failed to deliver and ended the movie in exactly the same position as which he started; hardly enough to instill fear.

In an interview with Collider, scribe Loveness defended his interpretation of Kang and his actions throughout Quantumania, even if it hardly got people buzzing for the all-powerful antagonist set to drive another three years and change of the MCU.

“I really defend our portrayal of Kang because we got to show a weakened, vulnerable Kang that’s sort of like Lion in Winter Kang, exiled Kang, and we got to strip him away from his almost omnipotent time powers, and we really got to see the person. I think that really shines through in those scenes with Janet.

That, to me, was way more important than showing a flashback of him killing the Hulk or something, you know? There’s gonna be plenty of time for that stuff. Don’t worry. I’m so happy that we got to show the broken humanity of Kang the Conqueror because now you’re gonna be rooting for that guy in whatever form he shows up, and whatever version of him he is. I’m thrilled with what Jonathan did. It was just masterful to watch him.”

As the credits reminded us, “Kang Will Return.” Lets hope that when that day comes, he’s finally presented as the unstoppable force we were told he was, but Quantumania never showed.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Scott Campbell
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves; Words. Lots of words.