Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
holdo star wars the last jedi
via Lucasfilm

‘Star Wars’ fans still aren’t done debating the Holdo maneuver

It looked incredible, but does it make sense?

It’s been five years since Star Wars: The Last Jedi, and many fans just can’t let go. Somewhere on the internet, there will always be fevered debate on Rian Johnson’s take on Luke Skywalker or his attempt to “democratize” the Force. However, there’s one scene in particular that drives fans of tactical realism in interstellar space combat nuts.

Recommended Videos

This is, of course, the notorious Holdo Maneuver. Faced with insurmountable odds and the need to save what’s left of the Resistance, Laura Dern’s Admiral Holdo tries something we’ve never seen in Star Wars before. She turns her cruiser around, fires up her hyperspace drive, and executes a kamikaze strike on the First Order fleet.

Leaving aside the quibbles over whether it’s plausible for Star Wars, it’s a jaw-droppingly cool moment and you could have heard a pin drop in theaters on opening night. And yet, fans on r/StarWars are still trading blows over whether it “breaks” the universe.

The common argument is that this is such an effective tactic we should be seeing it deployed in multiple battles, perhaps in the form of strapping hyperspace drives to asteroids and firing them at the enemy, even if there are a lot of people who defend the move and explain why it’s a one-off.

First up, in The Rise of Skywalker, it’s confirmed that this was a “one in a million” shot that’s almost impossible to recreate. That’s because the window of acceleration between realspace and hyperspace is so slim, that timing a Holdo maneuver is ultimately reliant on the will of the Force.

On top of that, it’s repeatedly pointed out that sacrificing capital ships in suicide strikes doesn’t make economic sense, and is only something you’d do as a last resort. Also, you need someone willing to kill themselves to do it, and the argument you could just use a droid doesn’t make sense as they’re clearly sentient, too.

That being said, it’s more difficult to refute the argument that the Holdo maneuver makes large bases like the Death Star vulnerable, though we suppose the trouble there is getting a large ship close enough to it so you hit the sweet spot as you accelerate.

Leaving all that aside, it was an incredibly cool moment in Star Wars, and even if it doesn’t strictly make sense we’re glad they included it. But now that the genie is out of the bottle, maybe we’ll see it used again sometime.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. Love writing about video games and will crawl over broken glass to write about anything related to Hideo Kojima. But am happy to write about anything and everything, so long as it's interesting!