Image Credit: Disney
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
what lies beneath
via 20th Century Fox

Were critics too harsh on a smash hit horror that only existed so Tom Hanks could lose weight and grow a beard?

Hanks wasn't even in it, either.

It sounds reductive to claim that one of the top-earning movies of the year it was released existed solely for the benefit of an actor who had absolutely nothing to do with the project, but in the broadest of terms that is indeed the case with Tom Hanks and What Lies Beneath.

Recommended Videos

Director Robert Zemeckis had already signed on to direct a screenplay penned by none other than Marvel Cinematic Universe veteran Clark Gregg, with Harrison Ford and Michelle Pfeiffer his only choices for the two lead roles, but the biggest problem posed in development was finding the time to actually shoot the thing.

via 20th Century Fox

As happenstance would have it, the Academy Award-winning Forrest Gump architect needed to shut down production on survival drama Cast Away for four months so that Hanks could lose 50 pounds and grow a long, straggly beard for his scenes as the emaciated version of plane crash survivor Chuck Noland, so Zemeckis decided to make the most of his downtime.

A large number of the Cast Away crew occupied themselves with What Lies Beneath, too, which proved to be a fruitful endeavor after it ended up hauling in an impressive $291 million at the box office. In spite of its success, though, critics weren’t entirely sold on the atmospheric supernatural shenanigans, with the film ending up on a disappointing 47 percent Rotten Tomatoes score.

However, a Reddit thread has posed the question asking if reviews were perhaps a little to harsh on What Lies Beneath, and the majority of the comments and replies at the time of writing seem to be in agreement that maybe the nail-biting terror deserved a better reputation than the unenthusiastic responses dictated.

We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Image of Scott Campbell
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves; Words. Lots of words.