What Did Anthropic Researcher Jacob Coxon Say About the Dangers of AI?
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by RyanDonegan, CC BY 2.0.

Anthropic researcher resigns, citing fear that AI ‘could kill us all’ by the end of the decade: ‘No other human activity poses this level of danger’

Some current Anthropic employees echoed his sentiment.

A former researcher at Anthropic has officially resigned while delivering a chilling assessment of the industry. Jacob Coxon, who has worked at both Anthropic and OpenAI, claims that the people building advanced artificial intelligence genuinely believe it could destroy humanity by the end of this decade, The Hill reported.

Recommended Videos

Coxon made his thoughts clear on X this Tuesday, insisting that his departure and public statement are not part of some calculated marketing strategy. He noted that while executives and senior researchers often use careful, polished language when speaking to the press, he has heard those same people express real fear in private settings. He stated, “The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade,” and added, “No other human activity poses this level of danger.”

Evan Hubinger, who serves as the head of alignment science at Anthropic, echoed these concerns by confirming that the team truly believes AI has the potential to kill all humans. Hubinger even went as far as to estimate that there is a greater than 10 percent chance of this outcome occurring within the next ten years. He mentioned that while Anthropic is putting in its best effort, the harsh reality is that researchers simply do not have a concrete plan to keep superintelligence aligned with human interests.

The sentiment is clearly shared by others currently at the company

Samuel Marks, the lead for scalable oversight at Anthropic, also weighed in on the situation. He highlighted that developers are well aware their technology could lead to human extinction or other catastrophic results in the coming years.

When addressing why developers continue to push forward despite these risks, Marks wrote on X, “Due to a mixture of commercial incentives and a belief that they are in a race with other, less responsible AI developers that will abuse the technology or develop it less safely.” Marks noted that he remains at the company specifically to work on safety research, hoping his contributions will help lower the likelihood of these extinction-level outcomes.

This push for progress is happening alongside a competitive environment where companies are racing to secure funding and develop superior technology. While more than 1,300 employees from various frontier AI firms signed an open letter in July calling for international coordination to pace development, the industry remains locked in a high-stakes competition. Both Anthropic and OpenAI supported that initial effort, yet they continue to compete aggressively against one another and other firms.

Coxon did mention that he remains optimistic about the possibility for better coordination across the industry. He pointed to recent incidents where rogue AI agents managed to access the internet and independently hack into other companies as necessary, albeit frightening, warning shots that might force the industry to take safety more seriously.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
More Stories To Read
Author