Karoline Leavitt blasted the NYT’s White House ballroom report as a hit piece, but she never actually addressed a single design flaw they raised

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt has pushed back against an architectural analysis in The New York Times of Donald Trump‘s proposed White House ballroom.

She took to social media to criticize the authors, praising President Trump as a builder of “world-class buildings” and his lead architect, Shalom Baranes. However, Leavitt did not address any of the specific design flaws detailed in the analysis.

Leavitt dismissed the critics as people who “never built anything,” even though one of the report’s authors is a trained architect. The analysis highlighted several notable aspects of the ballroom’s design, including that the grand staircase on the south portico appears to be purely decorative. It leads directly into a row of columns that block the windows, not to a door or an entrance. The New York Times report noted that “its stairs lead nowhere.”

The analysis also compared the speed of this project’s approval to other recent changes at the White House. A much smaller adjustment to the building’s fences during Trump’s first term took nine months of public meetings to get approved.

The Commission of Fine Arts, whose members were appointed by Trump, gave this ballroom project unanimous approval in a February vote. It is still waiting on a vote from the National Capital Planning Commission, which is also expected to approve the plan.

The ballroom’s cost has doubled since it was first announced, and legal challenges are still ongoing

On her X post, Leavitt reiterated Trump’s promise that the expansion would come “at no expense to the taxpayer,” saying he is “ensuring the People’s House finally has a beautiful ballroom that’s been needed for decades.” 

The president has pledged to privately fund the project, which is currently estimated to cost around $400 million. With markets already unsettled by broader policy uncertainty, analysts have been tracking how Trump’s decisions affect financial confidence.

Trump announced plans to demolish the White House’s East Wing back in July to make room for the new ballroom, which would be larger than the existing White House itself. Demolition of the wing, which previously held office space for the first lady and a movie theater, moved forward quickly in October.

The estimated cost of the project has been rising steadily since it was first announced, doubling from an initial estimate of $200 million to the current $400 million. The project is also facing a legal challenge from the National Trust for Historic Preservation.

The White House has previously stated that the president is “the best builder and developer in the entire world.” Still, neither Leavitt nor any other official has responded to the specific design concerns raised in the architectural report, including the staircase that leads to a wall of columns rather than an actual entrance.

The ballroom project continues to move forward despite the growing cost, the pending approval from the National Capital Planning Commission, and the ongoing legal challenge. Trump has faced scrutiny on several other fronts as well, including debate over whether voting by mail is acceptable after he cast a mail ballot himself. It remains one of the more ambitious and controversial changes ever proposed to the White House complex.