Barack Obama blasts thin-skinned bully Donald Trump for his endless obsession with petty revenge – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
WASHINGTON, DC - JANUARY 20: Former U.S. President Barack Obama attends the inauguration of Donald Trump in the U.S. Capitol Rotunda on January 20, 2025 in Washington, DC. Donald Trump takes office for his second term as the 47th president of the United States. (Photo by Saul Loeb - Pool/Getty Images)
(Photo by Saul Loeb – Pool/Getty Images)

Barack Obama blasts thin-skinned bully Donald Trump for his endless obsession with petty revenge

(Photo by Saul Loeb - Pool/Getty Images)

For someone who prides himself on being a “strongman,” Donald Trump has an awful lot in common with a dollar-store dictator.

Recommended Videos

He’s stuck in the role of a reality-TV villain, using the tools of the presidency like a vindictive HOA president who just found out his neighbor painted their mailbox the wrong shade of beige. And now, his latest stunt — threatening one of the most prestigious universities in the world because they didn’t kowtow to his demands — might just take the cake for pettiness. Meanwhile, Barack Obama, never one to miss an opportunity to point out Trump’s flaws (and let’s be honest, there are plenty), weighed in on the Harvard debacle with a scathing critique.

Trump and his administration recently decided that Harvard University hadn’t been behaving itself. Apparently, the Ivy League giant had failed some arbitrary loyalty test, so Trump’s team issued a laundry list of demands disguised as a crusade against antisemitism. Combatting antisemitism is, of course, a noble and necessary goal — something that should be taken seriously. But Trump’s intentions were less about protecting Jewish students and more about exerting control over academic institutions that he’s never been able to stomach. His disdain for elite universities has been well documented, fueled by the perception that they are bastions of liberal thought — places where, God forbid, people might openly criticize his administration.

Trump’s administration wanted Harvard to report students who were “hostile to American values,” implement “viewpoint diversity” in its academic departments, and even hire government-approved auditors to rummage through programs that allegedly fostered antisemitic harassment. If that wasn’t Orwellian enough for you, they also demanded that faculty be investigated for plagiarism.

Harvard, to its credit, wasn’t having it. The university’s president, Alan Garber, issued a firm response, declaring that no government—regardless of who’s in power—has the right to dictate what a private university can teach, who they can admit, or what they can research. So how did Trump respond? Predictably, like the aforementioned dollar-store dictator. Hours after Harvard’s defiance, his administration announced that they were freezing over $2 billion in federal funds for the university. That’s $2 billion meant for research, innovation, and education—money that ultimately benefits the country as a whole.

The Department of Education released a statement accusing the university of having an “entitlement mindset” and failing to protect Jewish students from harassment. This isn’t an isolated incident, either. His administration has gone after student visas, threatened funding for institutions that don’t comply with his policies, and even tried to ban diversity training on campuses. Harvard, with its $53 billion endowment, can perhaps weather this financial storm better than most institutions. But what about smaller institutions that can’t afford to lose federal funding? What about the chilling effect this kind of governmental overreach could have on academic freedom across the country? Those are the real stakes here.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Omar Faruque
Omar Faruque
Omar is an editor and writer for WGTC who sees life and storytelling as one and the same—there’s always a story to tell. When not behind his keyboard, Omar is living his best life, whether that is embracing his inner superhero, geeking out over his latest obsession, or tucking himself into the coziest coffee-shop corner with a great book in hand.