'Don’t let this fool you': Released Epstein files heavily redacted, 'mostly public information', GOP smokescreen – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
hislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and musician Michael Bolton pose for a portrait during a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000. (Photo by Davidoff Studios/Getty Images)
Photos by Davidoff Studios/Getty Images/House Oversight Committee

‘Don’t let this fool you’: Released Epstein files heavily redacted, ‘mostly public information’, GOP smokescreen

"This is beyond parody."

Last night, the House of Representatives tried to pour cold water on the raging Jeffrey Epstein fire by releasing 33,000 pages said to be from the “Epstein files”. 10 Epstein victims are currently in Washington, DC meeting politicians, with their harrowing testimony giving Congresswoman Nancy Mace a panic attack and causing her to leave in tears.

Recommended Videos

The documents, which Congress has made available on Google Drive (seems a little unprofessional, but whatever), consist of court filings related to Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, bodycam footage from police searches, and interviews. So, celebration time? Has the truth finally been revealed?

Sadly not. Those familiar with the case quickly realized most of these files were already publicly available and provide no new information or revelations. In addition, the few new documents included have been ludicrously heavily redacted:

Epstein observers online have (correctly) identified this “release” as a smokescreen tactic intended to spoil a cross-party discharge petition from Kentucky Republican Thomas Massie and California Democrat Ro Khanna. That seeks to force the release of all the files, save for redactions to avoid identifying victims and of any CSAM contained within.

Republican committee chair James Comer is now arguing that there’s no need for that discharge petition, a position echoed by Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson, who argues this document release marks the end of the saga and the petition should be scrapped: “It’s superfluous at this point, and I think we’re achieving the desired end here.”

“What a joke”

You don’t have to be a political genius to spot what’s happening here.  Robert Garcia, the top Dem representative on the oversight committee, immediately called this tactic out, saying: “The 33,000 pages of Epstein documents James Comer has decided to ‘release’ were already mostly public information. To the American people – don’t let this fool you.”

That was echoed online as the contents were pored over:

If Trump, Comer, and Johnson think we’ll be satisfied with this, they can think again. Republicans and Democrats have now met Epstein’s victims, with their testimony only hardening the opinion that the truth must be revealed, no matter how messy and damaging it might be.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. I cover politics, weird history, video games and... well, anything really. Keep it breezy, keep it light, keep it straightforward.