Trump's $1,000 baby account could take millions from Medicaid and benefit the rich – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

Trump’s $1,000 baby account could take millions from Medicaid and benefit the rich

A new policy promises $1,000 per child, but it could bankrupt Medicaid.

The recently proposed “Trump accounts,” a key part of the “One Big Beautiful Bill Act,” are meant to give newborns a financial head start. The program, which would run as a five-year trial, would put $1,000 into individual accounts for every baby born in the U.S. between Jan. 1, 2025, and December 31, 2028, as long as both parents and the child have Social Security numbers.

Recommended Videos

This money must be invested in low-cost, diversified U.S. stock index funds, and withdrawals are not allowed until the child turns 18. At that point, the funds can be used for approved expenses like college, buying a home, or starting a small business.

Full access to the account is allowed at age 30. Taking money out early for non-approved expenses comes with penalties. As found by Daily Mail, the accounts also allow family, friends, employers, or other groups to add more money each year, up to a total of $5,000 per year (though nonprofits can contribute more).

Trump helps the rich again, who knew?

So, you’re not actually getting any money for at most 18 years. Those who run the stocks will be getting a lot of money from being able to use that money the way they see fit until a withdrawal is made. Basically, your child’s name is being used for investment that taxpayers pay for so that those who manage the funds can benefit for almost 20 years. It’s like social security, but the rich take control of the money.

While the program is presented as helping all families, some worry that it favors the wealthy. Per CNN, the flat $1,000 contribution, which is the same regardless of a family’s income, gives a bigger advantage to richer families. These families have more money to add to the government’s contribution, which can greatly increase the final amount in the account. Experts estimate that a $1,000 investment in a broad stock index fund could grow to about $8,300 over 20 years.

According to the CBO’s revised analysis, the bill that would pay for this would add $2.4 trillion to the national debt over the next decade and strip roughly 10.9 million Americans of their healthcare benefits. The GOP has been pressured to push all of this through, but it comes with Medicaid cuts and stricter eligibility requirements, which could leave millions without essential care.

Families who can add more money could see much larger gains. On the other hand, lower-income families, who may not be able to add much extra money, might see less benefit. The $8,300, while useful, may not make a big difference in paying for college or buying a home, and it’s not a guarantee that the money will go up at all. This imbalance has led to criticism that the program is set up in a way that naturally helps wealthier families more.

Another concern is the program’s possible harm to Medicaid. The bill passed by the House includes changes that could lead to big cuts in Medicaid funding. These cuts raise questions about whether helping newborns with money is worth the risk of reducing healthcare access for lower-income families. The complicated rules for withdrawing money also weaken the program’s supposed benefits.

The limits on early withdrawals and the strict rules on how the money can be used might make it harder for families to access the funds in a financial emergency. Studies show that easy access is important for programs that help build wealth early in life. The “Trump accounts,” however, do not meet this standard.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jorge Aguilar
Jorge Aguilar
Aggy has worked for multiple sites as a writer and editor, and has been a managing editor for sites that have millions of views a month. He's been the Lead of Social Content for a site garnering millions of views a month, and co owns multiple successful social media channels, including a Gaming news TikTok, and a Facebook Fortnite page with over 700k followers. His work includes Dot Esports, Screen Rant, How To Geek Try Hard Guides, PC Invasion, Pro Game Guides, Android Police, N4G, WePC, Sportskeeda, and GFinity Esports. He has also published two games under Tales and is currently working on one with Choice of Games. He has written and illustrated a number of books, including for children, and has a comic under his belt. He does not lean any one way politically; he just reports the facts and news, and gives an opinion based on those.