Trump’s “no taxpayer cost” Ballroom bow balloons to $1B in government spending – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by Official White House Photo. Public Domain.

Trump’s “no taxpayer cost” Ballroom bow balloons to $1B in government spending

This is ultimately about whether Trump can be trusted to keep his word.

Turns out Donald Trump doesn’t keep his word. After months of relentlessly talking about a White House ballroom that cost $200 million in July 2025, that price tag slowly rose to $400 million as time progressed. Now they have finally hit a figure of $1 billion, and the most surprising part is that it will no longer be donor-funded as previously claimed.

Recommended Videos

According to a new report by The New York Times, the GOP Republicans have introduced a reconciliation bill in the Senate that is seeking $1 billion for Secret Service security updates on the much-discussed ballroom. A lot of MAGA loyalists are already pointing out that it’s only the security detail that is being funded — and that the actual construction is still being funded by donors.

In Trump’s defense, from YouTube to ABC to other media and tech titans had committed to joining Trump in building up the East Wing of the White House to Trump’s vision. But after Trump’s latest attempted attack during the White House Correspondents’ Dinner, Sen. Lindsey Graham shifted the conversation into one about security and requested Congress to approve $400 million for Trump’s ballroom.

As things stand, demolition is already done and construction is well underway — with its fair share of legal battles. At this juncture, skepticism is growing because there’s no clear demarcation on how much was donated to begin with, and how much is still left to meet the budget. The language in the bill doesn’t even clearly demonstrate what exactly qualifies as security apparatus and what does not.

On social media, a lot of users just assume that it means the entire ballroom will be constructed with the $1 billion requested — meaning that the amount of federal funding being requested can fully fund the ballroom. One user on X wrote, “I don’t ever want to hear another Republican senator or Republican congressman or congresswoman ever say anything about the spending habits of the Democratic Party.” Another was much harsher, writing, “It’s only just beginning. He’s going to start taking taxpayer money for his ugly arc and all the other things he wants to build and ruin D.C.”

According to the Trump administration, however, the nonprofit Trust for the National Mall will still be taking the lead in funding the ballroom, with Trump himself saying he would contribute personally.

No matter how you dice it up, Trump said and reiterated that “zero taxpayer dollars” would be necessary. But now the GOP is telling Americans that if they check the fine print, they’ll see that actually they’ll need to pay $1 billion in taxpayer dollars. That’s a gigantic difference.

During the war in Iran, which is still ongoing — or has already ended depending on what the Trump administration decides to tell the media today — a recurrent theme was what else that money could do instead. But that’s not the point here. The point is whether the word of the sitting United States president is worth anything. This is ultimately about whether Trump can be trusted to keep his word.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Fred Onyango
Fred Onyango
Fred Onyango is an entertainment journalist who primarily focuses on the intersection of entertainment, society, and politics. He has been writing about the entertainment industry for five years, covering celebrity, music, and film through the lens of their impact on society and politics. He has reported from the London Film Festival and was among the first African entertainment journalists invited to cover the Sundance Film Festival. Fun fact—Fred is also a trained pilot.