Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
U.S. President Joe Biden talks briefly with reporters as he departs the White House on October 24, 2024 in Washington, DC. With less than two weeks until Election Day, Biden told reporters that he is going to the battleground state of Arizona to formally apologize to Native Americans for the country’s role in the Indian boarding school system. (Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

What is the Presidential Records Act and did Joe Biden recently violate it?

Are the Republicans right to call for an investigation?

President Joe Biden has been under heavy fire for allegedly violating the Presidential Records Act of 1978. But what does this possible transgression even mean?

Recommended Videos

The Presidential Records Act fundamentally changed how presidential documentation is handled in American democracy. Enacted in response to the Nixon administration’s controversial handling of White House documents, this landmark legislation transformed presidential records from private property into public assets. 

The law requires the preservation of all presidential records, from formal documents to electronic communications, ensuring they belong to the American people rather than individual presidents. Under this framework, presidents and their staff must maintain accurate records of all official business, with these documents automatically transferring to the National Archives upon leaving office. The logic is simple: with enough paper trail, the citizens of the United States can hold the President accountable for what they say — as they should, since the President is a public servant.

How did Joe Biden supposedly violate the Presidential Records Act?

During a video call with Latino activists on the evening of Tuesday, October 26, Biden responded to comedian Tony Hinchcliffe’s derogatory comments about Puerto Rico at a Trump rally. According to the original stenographers’ transcript, Biden said, “The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters — his — his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American.”

The White House press office subsequently modified the transcript by adding an apostrophe to change “supporters” to “supporter’s,” attempting to indicate that Biden was referring to trash left behind by Hinchcliffe’s supporters, not the supporters themselves. This modification occurred after the press office “conferred with the president,” but without proper authorization from the White House Stenography Office. 

The head of the stenography office labeled this action as “a breach of protocol and spoliation of transcript integrity.” According to established procedures, while the Press Office may choose to withhold a transcript, it cannot independently edit it. This incident has created two different versions of the same presidential record — one held by the National Archives and another released to the public.

The timing of Biden’s remarks proved particularly awkward. Vice President Kamala Harris delivered a speech about treating Americans of differing ideologies with respect when Biden’s comments became public – which created a chasm between the President and the Democrat’s presidential candidate. In addition, the Trump campaign quickly capitalized on the controversy, with Trump himself staging a photo opportunity inside a garbage truck. Finally, House Republicans, led by Oversight Chairman James Comer and Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, have accused the White House of violating the Presidential Records Act by “releasing a false transcript.” They have demanded the preservation of all related documents and communications, suggesting a potential congressional investigation.

So, did a violation of the Presidential Acts occur? The inclusion of the apostrophe in the transcript indicates two interpretations of what Biden says, both possible considering the limitations of oral communication in this specific matter. However, the unauthorized alteration of an official transcript could violate the Presidential Records Act, potentially leading to legal consequences and congressional oversight investigations. 

The rewrite procedure didn’t follow all the expected protocols, that’s for sure. Now, we have to wait to see what a potential investigation will say about the severity of the change.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Marco Vito Oddo
Marco Vito Oddo
Marco Vito Oddo is a writer, journalist, and amateur game designer. Passionate about superhero comic books, horror films, and indie games, he has his byline added to portals such as We Got This Covered, The Gamer, and Collider. When he's not working, Marco Vito is gaming, spending time with his dog, or writing fiction. Currently, he's working on a comic book project named Otherkin.