Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image via Twitter/@nytimes

Why did ‘The New York Times’ lose its blue checkmark on Twitter?

As Twitter removes legacy verification, is any account safe?

A new Twitter update will see many verified accounts losing that coveted status as owner Elon Musk cracks down on accounts who refuse to pay for premium Twitter subscriptions.

Recommended Videos

The subscription service starts at $8 a month, and unless accounts pay up, they can say goodbye to their blue checkmark as Musk slowly removes the legacy verification program. Before he purchased Twitter last year, verification came at no cost and was given freely to high-profile users and organizations. The checkmark would easily allow potential followers to know whether an account was the real deal or a fake, but with the new paid system, users can easily masquerade as a verified account by simply purchasing one.

As of writing, most accounts with legacy verification still retain their blue checkmarks, but some notable accounts are already losing the status. Notably, the main account of The New York Times lost its verified status early Sunday as Musk rolls out the change. Twitter users were quick to notice other accounts from similar news organization still had their verifications, prompting them to wonder why The New York Times lost its so early.

Musk on why The New York Times lost its checkmark

Saturday evening, Musk began posting disparaging tweets about the New York Times. The Twitter owner complained that the news organization’s “propaganda isn’t even interesting,” and criticized its Twitter feed as “unreadable.” These tweets followed an article written by the New York Times this past week where the publication stated it wouldn’t be paying the $8 a month to keep its blue tick. Evidently, Musk wasn’t too happy with this statement and after taking the publication’s checkmark, posted the aforementioned tweets.

According to The Associated Press, the Times released another statement after losing its checkmark where it doubled down on the decision to not pay for verification or for reporters’ own personal accounts unless necessary for “reporting purposes.” Other news organizations who have publicly refused to pay for verification, like The Associated Press and The Los Angeles Times, still have verified accounts. However, as of writing, Musk hasn’t criticized those organizations on his Twitter account so maybe they have escaped his critical gaze for the time-being.

The New York Times isn’t alone in criticizing the decision to remove legacy checkmarks; celebrities like Jack Black have complained the move is unfair, and some like Patton Oswalt have even gone as far as calling the move “sad and desperate.” In the coming days, it’s likely more prominent accounts will lose their verified status as Musk continues to try to make Twitter profitable after purchasing the site for a whopping $44 billion.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Staci White
Staci White
Since the moment she listened to her first Britney Spears CD at the tender age of six, Staci has been a lover of all things pop culture. She graduated from UCLA with a Bachelors in Linguistics and somehow turned her love of music, movies, and media into a career as an entertainment writer. When she’s not writing for WGTC, she’s busy fulfilling her own pop star dreams as a singer/songwriter or hanging out at her local coffee shops.