Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Broadchurch Season 2 Review

There didn’t need to be a second season of Broadchurch. The first series of episodes from 2013 didn’t just spawn a quick series of dreary, Europe-based crime show imitators involving youths in a small town, but crossed the pond to the point that Fox aired a blander American variation last fall. (It was titled Gracepoint, which I reviewed for ten inconsistent weeks.) Daniel Latimer’s murder seemed to be wrapped up pretty tightly by the end of season one, with nary a loose corner in sight.
This article is over 9 years old and may contain outdated information

embargoed_until_6th_january_broadchurch_ep1_05

Recommended Videos

Mark and Beth Latimer are also pining for second chances. She wants to rekindle a bit of spark in her marriage, while he hopes to be around for his infant daughter, Elizabeth. Since the Latimers have to share screen time with the afflicted Claire and Lee, this limits some of the time that could be spent with Broadchurch’s community, still reeling from Danny’s tragic murder and the ensuing mystery. The most egregious miss in the first half of season two is Tom Miller, who finds a sort of father figure in Mark but rarely gets a moment to express his grief and disbelief about his own incarcerated dad.

Despite some potent character-driven moments, some of the convenient plotting on Broadchurch becomes questionable. At the end of the second episode, an unlikely encounter between two characters throws at least one story in a direction it could have only moved due to that meeting. Also convenient: one major person from Seabrook bumps into Hardy right before he becomes a central figure in the investigation.

Both Lee and Claire also happen to pass along information a bit too freely to the detectives, perhaps as a way to force along the stagnant Seabrook case. The biggest issue with these new characters is that both of them are unreliable narrators. Furthermore, since we’re at a remove from the citizens of Seabrook and we can only understand the details from that case through sparse exposition, the second season’s mystery story begs for some of the intrigue of the central whodunit from the previous year.

As season two slows the pacing from season one, you can tell Chibnall and his team of directors are working extra hard to hold viewers’ attentions. The chilly, ambient score (courtesy of Ólafur Arnalds) rarely reached a cacophony in the previous season but is sometimes overbearing here – especially in moments that could have vital plot information. In a few scenes from the first episodes, the music drowns out some of the courtroom dialogue. Although the music surges to accompany the stunned or distraught faces of the characters as they react to new developments in the trial, the volume becomes overbearing. In scenes at the beach, meanwhile, the whipping wind and crashing waves threaten to overwhelm the sound mix, too.

Despite these issues, the most arresting moments from the opening episodes all take place in the Wessex Courthouse, as Beth and Ellie take the stand and try their best to keep their emotions in check during tough interrogations. Directors James Strong and Jessica Hogg propel the editing as the questions become more pointed, before lingering on the wilting faces of the witnesses as Sharon rips into them. Our emotional investment in these characters, and our knowledge of their shattered home lives as a result of the investigation, rouses our attention to ensure they do not crack under the pressure from Sharon’s potent, inflammatory questions. Sharon leers into both women, trying to provoke a response, although it remains fishy that none of the other lawyers or the presiding judge find the defense’s questions to be too scandalous.

Broadchurch’s first season was a master-class of plotting and performance that never lost its compelling edge for eight episodes. In comparison, the second season still has the stunning portrayals from Tennant, Colman and Whittaker, as well as a few new actors, but here the action feels padded rather than propulsive.

To keep our attention, Chibnall hooks us for the next episode with some big cliffhangers, often with turns that could affect the outcome of the Latimer trial. However, a few too many plot points hinge on some unnecessarily forced character decisions and coincidences, while the Seabrook mystery is far from the gripping Latimer case. Even with some stylistic and storytelling concerns, the courtroom scenes are as riveting as Broadchurch has ever been. There is an emotional investment within admirers of the first season to keep watching until a verdict is reached, and that alone is enough for fans of the British mystery to tune in.

Broadchurch Season 2
One of television's finest mysteries returns with a thrillingly acted second season, even if the central mystery isn't as compelling this time around.

We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jordan Adler
Jordan Adler
Jordan Adler is a film buff who consumes so much popcorn, he expects that a coroner's report will one day confirm that butter runs through his veins. A recent graduate of Carleton's School of Journalism, where he also majored in film studies, Jordan's writing has been featured in Tribute Magazine, the Canadian Jewish News, Marketing Magazine, Toronto Film Scene, ANDPOP and SamaritanMag.com. He is also working on a feature-length screenplay.