JD Vance claims gutting social programs is actually ‘pro-children’ in the most shameless spin attempt ever

Republicans are trying to change public opinion about President Donald Trump’s recent reconciliation bill, which has faced strong opposition from the American public. The bill, which includes major cuts to social programs, is being reframed as helpful to working families.

Vice President JD Vance spoke in Pennsylvania on Wednesday, focusing on the bill’s child care tax credits while avoiding discussion of the significant cuts to Medicaid and SNAP programs. He attempted to present the legislation as beneficial for families across different economic backgrounds, continuing his controversial policy positions that have drawn scrutiny.

According to MSNBC, while speaking at the event, Vance claimed that whether someone works at “Don’s Machine Shop or you’re the vice president, it’s all in the service of giving our kids the incredible opportunities that we’ve had,” trying to position the controversial bill as pro-children.

Tax credits fail to address the real child care crisis

While the bill does include some support for child care costs through programs like the Dependent Care Assistance Program and Child Tax Credit expansions, these benefits are minimal compared to actual child care expenses. Low-income households will save approximately $150 on taxes next year, while middle-income families will save about $1,800. These savings are small compared to the average annual child care cost of $13,128 for one child in 2024.

The poorest families are unlikely to qualify for these child-related tax credits, yet they will be most affected by the law’s cuts. The legislation is expected to reduce the income of the poorest 20% of Americans by about 2.9%, or $700.

The bill introduces “Trump Accounts,” which are basic savings accounts with a $1,000 flat rate for families to invest their own money. However, experts say these accounts will not create significant wealth for families.

Half of American families live in areas considered child care “deserts,” where there are more than three young children for every available child care spot. The problem goes beyond affordability, as many families struggle to find any available care options, even at high prices.

Critics argue that the real solution to America’s child care crisis requires direct government investment rather than tax credits, especially given disturbing Republican policies that have historically separated families. They point to the Child Care for Working Families Act, supported by over 100 House and Senate Democrats, as a more comprehensive approach to addressing the issue by ensuring fair worker pay and expanding access to high-quality care programs.