'Can’t vote to fund this lawless Department': Chris Murphy slams DHS and threatens government shutdown – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Photo by Jemal Countess/Getty Images for MoveOn Civic Action

‘Can’t vote to fund this lawless Department’: Chris Murphy slams DHS and threatens government shutdown

They have drawn the line in the sand!

Senate Democrats are absolutely furious over the actions of federal immigration agents and are threatening to shut down the government if they don’t get serious reforms to the Department of Homeland Security. This intense political standoff is being led by Senator Chris Murphy of Connecticut, who is making it crystal clear that he will vote against any measure that funds DHS without imposing strict constraints on federal officers.

Recommended Videos

This massive confrontation is a result of the fatal shooting Alex Pretti, an event that has sparked widespread condemnation on Capitol Hill. The Hill reported that Sen. Murphy didn’t hold back when describing the situation, telling a television host that Democrats simply “can’t vote to fund this lawless Department of Homeland Security.”

The deadline to avoid a partial government shutdown is coming up this Friday, and many Democratic senators are vowing to oppose any funding bill that doesn’t include major changes. DHS oversees both Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and Customs and Border Patrol (CBP). President Trump’s administration has been utilizing both departments across the country for sweeping crackdowns on migrants, a move that many Democrats consider excessive.

I don’t think they are wrong to be worried that if funding passes, there will be no changes

Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York confirmed this unified opposition. He stated that his caucus will not provide the necessary votes to pass the six-bill appropriations package if that DHS funding measure is still a part of it. This partisan divide was already visible in the House of Representatives, which narrowly, 220 to 207.

The Senate’s stand is a tough spot for Congress because that appropriations package funds several other crucial agencies housed under DHS, including the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Transportation Security Agency. 

Murphy believes the issue goes beyond one isolated incident. He argues that the deployment of these federal agents amounts to a “nationwide campaign of lawlessness.” He emphasized that he isn’t aiming to “fix every single problem.” He just requires “constraints” on federal immigration officers, like the inclusion of body cameras during operations to create an objective record of what happens. It’s a fair ask when to see how ICE agents treat anyone who opposes them.

Murphy summed up the gravity of the situation in a powerful statement. “I swore an oath to the Constitution,” the Connecticut Democrat said. “So did every single United States Senator. We cannot fund a Department of Homeland Security that is murdering American citizens.” It isn’t just the Democrats looking for accountability, most Americans don’t believe that the ICE agents are justified in their actions.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz is a freelance writer who likes to use words to explore all the things that fascinate her. You can usually find her doing unnecessarily deep dives into games, movies, or fantasy/Sci-fi novels. Or having rousing debates about how political and technological developments are causing cultural shifts around the world.