Bill Clinton asked point-blank about Trump in Epstein probe — his response set off a war of words

Bill Clinton has finally given his long-awaited deposition before the House Oversight Committee regarding his past association with Jeffrey Epstein. Republicans reportedly entered the closed-door session eager to hear what Clinton might say about Donald Trump. Instead, many left describing his answers as limited and cautious.

The Epstein scandal has cast a long shadow over numerous public figures. Both Clinton and Hillary Clinton have now been deposed. They have expressed frustration with what they view as attempts by the current administration and its allies to invoke their names as a political counterweight to scrutiny surrounding Trump’s own past comments and associations.

Like Hillary Clinton’s session, Bill Clinton’s deposition was conducted behind closed doors. It is highly unusual for former presidents to sit for congressional depositions, but Clinton reportedly framed his participation as a demonstration that no one is above the law. Committee Chair James Comer is said to have asked Clinton whether he believed Trump should also be deposed.

According to Newsweek, Comer recalled Clinton’s response as measured. “And President Clinton said, ‘That’s for you to decide,’” Comer recounted. He added that Clinton went on to say Trump “has never said anything to me to make me think he was involved,” clarifying that he meant involvement with Epstein.

Comer later described Clinton’s answer as “interesting,” adding, “I know there’s a lot of obsession about President Trump from the media, a lot of curiosity about President Trump from the media.”

Democratic Rep. Robert Garcia criticized Republicans for publicly characterizing parts of the deposition. “I think the best response to that would be to view the complete record of what actually he said,” Garcia stated. “We’re not going to disclose what was said because that’s not in the rules. The Republicans keep breaking the rules.”

Garcia further suggested that Comer’s summary did not capture the entirety of Clinton’s remarks, claiming there was “additional information” about Trump that was not publicly shared. His proposed solution: release the full transcript. “Let’s release the full transcript so you can all get a full record of what was actually said, which brings up some very important new questions about comments President Trump has actually said in the past,” Garcia said.

Clinton later issued his own statement. “First, I had no idea of the crimes Epstein was committing,” he said. “No matter how many photos you show me, I have two things that at the end of the day matter more than your interpretation of those 20-year-old photos. I know what I saw, and more importantly, what I didn’t see. I know what I did, and more importantly, what I didn’t do. I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong.”

As political tensions continue and other geopolitical issues demand attention, the Epstein matter remains a source of ongoing partisan friction. Releasing the full deposition transcript, as some lawmakers have suggested, could provide clarity and potentially bring an end to the latest round of back-and-forth.

The most important issue remains the victims. So far, the steady drip of files and depositions has revealed far more about political positioning than about accountability. For many lawmakers, the central question appears to be who “wins” this debacle — not how justice is served or how survivors are supported.