Former National Security Council senator blasts Trump after decoding direct reason behind Iran school strike – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Image by Office of Rep. Andy Kim, Public domain. Via Wikimedia Commons.

Former National Security Council senator blasts Trump after decoding direct reason behind Iran school strike

He details how the administration systematically killed thousands of innocents.

Senator Andy Kim (D- NJ) is directly linking the recent missile strike on an elementary school in Iran to budget cuts made by the Trump administration. That incident tragically hit a school located near an Iranian base, killing more than 170 people, with most of the victims being children. Military officials are now speculating that the strike may have relied on outdated intelligence data.

Recommended Videos

Kim, who was on the National Security Council under Obama, pointed out that Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth significantly cut funding and staff for the Civilian Protection Center, a program specifically designed to reduce civilian casualties during military operations. “The problem, though, is Secretary Hegseth decided to gut this office last year and has dramatically reduced the staff, not implementing the budget that is necessary,” Kim explained. 

“This fault lies directly on President Trump and Secretary Hegseth. They are clearly the ones who gave the orders in terms of how they should go about the risk analysis.” According to The Hill, Kim added that cutting this crucial office clearly demonstrates just how much this administration has deprioritized the protection of innocent civilians.

He does have a point

You can imagine the gravity of the situation when Kim concluded, “Now we find ourselves facing one of the worst losses of civilian life at the hands of Americans in decades.” This isn’t just a senator’s opinion, either. Reports earlier this month indicated that the Defense Department’s Civilian Harm Mitigation and Response action plan has seen its budget slashed by a staggering 90 percent.

Hegseth himself boasted that U.S. forces were “unleashing the most lethal and precise air power campaign in history” with “maximum authorities.” He went on to say, “No stupid rules of engagement, no nation-building quagmire, no democracy building exercise, no politically correct wars.” 

Hegseth emphasized a focus on winning, stating, “We fight to win, and we don’t waste time or lives.” This devastating strike on the elementary school, however, has become a major source of concern, resonating deeply with lawmakers from both sides of the aisle on Capitol Hill. 

Even Republican Senator John Kennedy from Louisiana weighed in on Tuesday, calling the strike a “mistake.” “I mean, we’re investigating but I’m not going to hide behind that,” Kennedy said in an interview. “I think that it was a terrible, terrible mistake.” 

The aftermath of this strike is creating significant questions and concerns across the political spectrum. The investigation is ongoing. However, despite growing evidence to the contrary, the administration has tried to shift blame to Iran and even other countries. It makes me wonder if we will ever learn the truth.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz is a freelance writer who likes to use words to explore all the things that fascinate her. You can usually find her doing unnecessarily deep dives into games, movies, or fantasy/Sci-fi novels. Or having rousing debates about how political and technological developments are causing cultural shifts around the world.