13 U.S. servicemen are dead and hundreds are wounded, so guess what's Donald Trump's natural instinct? – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Donald Trump plans to send more troops to the Middle East amid Iran war
Image by Michael Vadon, CC BY-SA 2.0.

13 U.S. servicemen are dead and hundreds are wounded, so guess what’s Donald Trump’s natural instinct?

Is half the American population that voted for him still happy with their decision?

There’s a brand of logic that runs through every military misadventure in American history, whether it’s the swamps of Vietnam or the rubble of Fallujah. If it isn’t working, do more of it.

Recommended Videos

Make it harder. Louder. With more bodies.

And Donald Trump, never one to be outdone by history’s biggest mistakes, appears to be reaching for that same playbook with Iran.

Two weeks into Operation Epic Fury, the U.S. and Israeli military campaign against the Middle Eastern country has left more than 1,500 civilians dead. The New York Times claims that 17 U.S. bases in the region have sustained varying degrees of damages, and with the recent downing of a KC-135 refueling aircraft, the number of deceased American servicemen has reached 13, with TIME reporting that at least 140 more are wounded, with 8 suffering severe injuries.

Trump can play this game with the best of them. He stood at Dover Air Force Base with the grieving families of the fallen and saluted their flag-draped cases, but at the same time, he doesn’t mind that this senseless war is putting economic pressure on dozens of ally countries around the world, and that more death and destruction is all but guaranteed if he doesn’t end it soon.

In fact, the Pentagon has just ordered a Marine Expeditionary Unit—a rapid response force of roughly 2,500 Marines and sailors—to deploy to the region, giving Iranian missiles, which, unlike what Trump claims, still keep coming in their droves, even more targets on the ground.

Administration officials insist there are no current plans for ground troops inside Iran. They have, however, also refused to rule it out. According to NBC News, Trump has privately expressed serious interest in deploying U.S. troops on Iranian soil, discussing the concept with aides and Republican officials as part of his vision for a post-war Iran aligned with American interests.

That’s fancy talk for getting the country’s oil, like he did with Venezuela. Except of course, China and Russia would never allow the United States to get such a vital chokehold on not just Iran’s natural resources but also the Strait of Hormuz, through which moves around 20% of the world’s oil and gas.

This is the very architecture of escalation. A war launched with no defined mission and a finish line that keeps moving. Trump’s rhetoric changes from unconditional surrender to regime change to securing nuclear stockpiles faster than a hypersonic missile flying over the region right now, and Iran, for their part, has already warned what would happen if more U.S. troops appeared in the region.

“We are waiting for them,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told NBC News when asked about a ground invasion. “That would be a big disaster for them.”

He may be right. But disasters have never been much of a deterrent for President Trump.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jonathan Wright
Jonathan Wright
Jonathan is a religious consumer of movies, TV shows, video games, and speculative fiction. And when he isn't doing that, he likes to write about them. He can get particularly worked up when talking about 'The Lord of the Rings' or 'A Song of Ice and Fire' or any work of high fantasy, come to think of it.