FBI agents say they were fired for investigating Donald Trump — now they’re fighting back

Two former FBI agents have filed a lawsuit accusing FBI Director Kash Patel and Attorney General Pam Bondi of violating their rights. The pair say they played only a minor role in the investigation into Donald Trump’s alleged criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election — and that, in retaliation, the administration fired them anyway.

The probe into Trump’s role in the January 6 Capitol attack began in early 2022 under the codename “Arctic Frost.” It was led by Jack Smith, and by August 2023, Trump had been indicted on four charges. But after Trump won the 2024 election, Smith moved to dismiss the case, following longstanding Department of Justice policy that prevents active investigations of a sitting president. After all, being president — and managing an ongoing war he once promised to avoid — tends to take up the full schedule.

Apparently, dropped charges weren’t the end of it. Patel has since been steadily removing agents connected to Arctic Frost. The firings themselves raised eyebrows, but the timing has added another layer of intrigue. Patel’s own relationship with Trump has reportedly been under strain — particularly after the Winter Olympics, where Patel made headlines for celebrating with hockey players in the locker room like he’d just secured a gold medal himself. Not illegal, just… ambitious.

Reports suggest Trump was unhappy with the optics and personally reached out to Patel. Shortly after, another round of firings followed at the FBI. Whether the two are connected hasn’t been made explicit, but in an administration where perception often drives action, the timing hasn’t gone unnoticed.

The agents in question were dismissed late last year. According to their lawsuit, the administration also publicized their identities — a move they argue has put them at risk. Their attorney told NBC News that the exposure could “pose a new threat… not simply harming their employment prospects, but placing their actual physical safety and mental health at risk.” In other words, it’s not just about losing a job — it’s about what comes after.

The lawsuit claims their First and Fifth Amendment rights were violated, arguing that they were stigmatized over perceived political leanings and denied due process. Their legal team is building a case that frames the firings as both punitive and unconstitutional — essentially turning routine employment action into a broader test of executive power.

That tension with legal norms isn’t entirely new for this administration. Trump has recently criticized the Supreme Court of the United States for being too committed to “honesty” to rule in his favor — which is one way to describe judicial independence. The FBI under Patel appears to be operating in a similar orbit. When asked about the lawsuit, Patel accused the agents of “weaponizing the law,” which is becoming something of a default setting in these disputes.

According to the filing, both agents had met — and in some cases exceeded — expectations in their roles, with documented instances of Patel himself praising one of them during internal training sessions. Which makes their sudden dismissal feel less like a performance issue and more like something else entirely.