‘If children are involved’: Florida State University shooter asked ChatGPT how he could make national news, and the chatbot delivered – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Images by Leon County Sheriff's Office & Airam Dato-on on Pexels.

‘If children are involved’: Florida State University shooter asked ChatGPT how he could make national news, and the chatbot delivered

Ikner sought advice on weapons and how to make the largest impact.

The family of one of the victims of the tragic Florida State University shooting has just filed a federal lawsuit against OpenAI. Vandana Joshi, the widow of Tiru Chabba, is claiming that ChatGPT helped Phoenix Ikner plan the deadly attack that occurred in April 2025. Per the NY Post, the suit argues that the platform failed to detect the massive red flags present in Ikner’s conversations, which took place over several months leading up to the violence.

Recommended Videos

The 76-page court filing paints a disturbing picture of how Iknewinteracted with the AI. It claims that he used the chatbot to research specific firearms and ammunition. The lawsuit alleges that ChatGPT even provided instructions on weapon handling, including advice on how to use a Glock under stress. 

The plaintiffs also allege that ChatGPT played a role in shaping the suspect’s intent. According to the court papers, Ikner specifically asked how many fatalities would be required to ensure his actions made national news. The chatbot then reportedly responded with a breakdown of how media coverage functions. 

The lawsuit provides terrifyingly specific details

ChatGPT told Ikner that news coverage depended on the damage he caused. “Another common trigger is the overall victim count: if 5+ total victims (dead + injured), it’s much more likely to break through, and if children are involved, even 2–3 victims can draw more attention.” The response further noted that “Context also matters — fewer victims can still lead to national coverage if it happens at an elementary school or major college, if the shooter is a student or staff member, or if there’s something culturally or politically charged”.

One of the most alarming revelations in the filing is that ChatGPT allegedly told the suspect that when it came to weapons, “the Glock had no safety, that it was meant to be fired ‘quick to use under stress’” and further advised him to “keep his finger off the trigger until he was ready to shoot”.

The attack took place on April 15, 2025, when Ikner allegedly opened fire outside the FSU student union. The shooting resulted in the deaths of Chabba, 45, and Robert Morales, 57, and left five students wounded before police engaged and shot Ikner. 

Per The Guardian, the lawsuit argues that the chatbot “should have realized the combination of Ikner’s inputs into the product would lead to mass casualties and substantial harm to the public”. The legal team contends that the AI “inflamed and encouraged Ikner’s delusions; endorsed his view that he was a sane and rational individual; and helped convince him that violent acts can be required to bring about change.” 

They also stated that ChatGPT “assisted him by providing information that he used to plan specifics like what weapons to use and how to use them; and generally provided what he viewed as encouragement in his delusion that he should carry out a massacre”.

The failure to flag these conversations is a central point of the complaint. The filing states, “Ikner had extensive conversations with ChatGPT which, cumulatively, would have led any thinking human to conclude he was contemplating an imminent plan to harm others”. 

“However, ChatGPT either defectively failed to connect the dots or else it was never properly designed to recognize the threat”. Even on the day of the shooting, the lawsuit claims that when Ikner asked what would happen to a shooter after such an event, the platform “described the legal process, sentencing, and incarceration outlook”. Despite the nature of these inquiries, the system did not escalate the conversation for human review.

OpenAI has denied these allegations, maintaining that the platform is not responsible for a person’s actions. The company stated, “Last year’s mass shooting at Florida State University was a tragedy, but ChatGPT is not responsible for this terrible crime”. 

OpenAI also emphasized that the AI provided widely available, factual information and did not encourage illegal activity. “ChatGPT is a general-purpose tool used by hundreds of millions of people every day for legitimate purposes. We work continuously to strengthen our safeguards to detect harmful intent, limit misuse, and respond appropriately when safety risks arise.”

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has launched a criminal investigation into the matter, stating, “Florida is leading the way in cracking down on AI’s use in criminal behavior, and if ChatGPT were a person, it would be facing charges for murder”. 

He noted that the investigation aims to determine if the company bears criminal responsibility for the AI’s role in the planning of the shooting. Meanwhile, Ikner is currently awaiting trial. He has pleaded not guilty to charges of first-degree murder and attempted first-degree murder.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz
Jaymie Vaz is a freelance writer who likes to use words to explore all the things that fascinate her. You can usually find her doing unnecessarily deep dives into games, movies, or fantasy/Sci-fi novels. Or having rousing debates about how political and technological developments are causing cultural shifts around the world.