'Check that guy's hard drive': 132 Minnesota Reps vote for ban on using AI to generate naked kids, just one Republican opposed it – We Got This Covered
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
Screengrab via YouTube
Rep Drew Roach / Screengrab via YouTube

‘Check that guy’s hard drive’: 132 Minnesota Reps vote for ban on using AI to generate naked kids, just one Republican opposed it

Well of course it was a Republican.

For better or worse, AI is transforming the world. On the plus side, it’s now easy to generate videos of squirrels doing the Macarena and pictures of yourself hanging out with Arnold Schwarzenegger. On the downside, it’s putting millions of people out of work, consuming a ridiculous amount of precious natural resources, and eroding the very concept of truth. So, a mixture of good and bad.

Recommended Videos

Lawmakers across the world are grappling with how to regulate AI, but Minnesota lawmakers just took a firm cross-party stance on something that frankly shouldn’t need to be debated.

A few days ago, they voted on bill HF1606, which is designed to ban AI “nudification” tech, with Rep. Jessica Hanson arguing:

“We need to ban nudification features because they allow users to create non-consensual, unauthorized deep fakes of sexually explicit content, including child sexual abuse material.”

Of the 134 members of the Minnesota House of Representatives, 132 of them voted for this bill, a rare instance of Republicans and Democrats uniting in cross-party consensus that using AI to generate naked images of adults and children without their consent should be illegal. One member was absent, and one member was the sole “No” vote.

Roach by name…

Republican Rep. Drew Roach apparently decided that this was the hill he was willing to die on, making a somewhat flimsy case that the bill won’t solve the problem. He explained:

“What we’re going to do here is we’re going to attack a software, a manufacturer and instead, shifting our focus on that instead of the perpetrators of these crimes. If we want to prevent this from happening in the future, we should go after those perpetrators with the full force of the law.”

His confused colleagues pointed out that HF1606 goes after the root cause, with Rep. Hanson patiently explaining that existing criminal law already goes after perpetrators.

Judging by the replies, it’s safe to say Roach may have picked the wrong cause to champion:

Then again, given Roach’s legislative record, perhaps we shouldn’t be surprised. He has apparently crusaded to get Minnesota’s ban on conversion therapy for gay people lifted:

He also believes Jan. 6 was “a hoax”:

Nominative determinism is a heck of a thing, so in this case, we have to wonder what rock Roach is going to scuttle under next. Will he advocate for every Minnesota schoolchild to open carry? Perhaps a bill mandating toxic waste be dumped in the drinking water reservoir? Ooh, how about a statue of Greg Bovino in downtown Minneapolis?


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. I cover politics, weird history, video games and... well, anything really. Keep it breezy, keep it light, keep it straightforward.