Meghan Trainor welcoming third baby compared to ‘breeding livestock’ as trolls conveniently ignore her past

Meghan Trainor is absolutely shutting down online critics who are attacking her decision to use a surrogate to welcome her third baby, insisting that every family’s journey is “extremely valid.” The singer recently announced the arrival of her third child, a son named Mikey Moon.

When she shared the news, she made a point of thanking the “incredible, superwoman surrogate” who carried Mikey, explaining that using a surrogate was the safest way for her and her husband to keep growing their family. Trainor has been open in the past about wanting a huge family, ideally with at least four kids, and she’s said she’d do whatever it takes to achieve that goal.

This wasn’t a choice made lightly; it’s rooted in serious health concerns. Trainor has suffered through two incredibly difficult pregnancies that left her with significant post-partum distress. After her first son was born, he required care in the neonatal intensive care unit, which left Trainor dealing with post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD.

There’s nothing wrong with surrogacy

For any mother, dealing with that level of trauma and then trying to manage the physical toll of recovery is just awful. It makes perfect sense that the famous musician would choose a path that prioritizes her health and safety.

Despite her history of complications being public knowledge, the internet quickly became a toxic mess. Critics accused her of choosing surrogacy for purely vain reasons, claiming that because she’s a successful woman, she simply decided to “buy” a baby to avoid the hassle of pregnancy.

One extremely popular comment on X, which racked up nearly 123,000 likes, called the practice “diabolical.” The user wrote, “The concept of a rich woman buying a poor woman’s womb then holding the baby in her arms and crying as if she had given birth herself. Nobody can convince me that this isn’t diabolical. I have no respect for any of this.”

Another user on X made a completely bizarre connection, claiming that the singer’s weight loss, often referred to as “ozempic face,” and her use of a surrogate were somehow related. The backlash didn’t stop there. Some critics took issue with her posting photos showing skin-to-skin contact with the newborn, calling it “performative,” even though that contact is a medically recommended and beautiful way to bond with a child right after birth.

The biggest and most intense debate, however, centered on the ethical ramifications of surrogacy itself. The most intense comment of all came from a user on X who claimed that surrogacy is “one of the most self-important and brutal practices and is no more ethical than breeding livestock.” Hearing things like that must be devastating, especially when you’re already recovering from the birth of a child.

The severe commentary forced Trainor to address the situation directly. She defended her decision by making a clear point that there is simply no wrong way to build a family. She wants people to stop treating surrogacy like a shameful secret.

Trainor said, “I want people to know that surrogacy is just another beautiful way to build a family. It’s not something to whisper about or judge. It’s rooted in trust, science, love, and teamwork. Every family’s journey looks different, and all of them are extremely valid.” She added that she and the surrogate “felt so connected throughout the entire journey,” which is a wonderful testament to the trust involved.