An Awful Adaptation of an Iconic Tale Delivered One of Its Best Endings
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
dracula-2000
via Miramax

An awful adaptation of an iconically terrifying tale delivered one of its greatest-ever endings out of nowhere

Talk about a juxtaposition.

Alongside Sherlock Holmes, Bram Stoker’s Dracula is one of the two most heavily-adapted characters in the history of fiction, meaning that it became incredibly difficult to try and put a fresh coat of paint on the well-worn lore a long time ago.

Recommended Videos

Not that it stops anyone from repeatedly trying to shine a brand new spotlight on the legendary vampire, with countless projects revolving around the most famous bloodsucker of them all emerging on an annual basis, and several more lined up for release in the not too distant future. In a twist of incredible irony, though, one of the worst ever made also happened to deliver an ending so surprising and unexpected that you’re left wishing it unfolded in a much better movie.

dracula-2000
via Miramax

A cringeworthy product of its time when viewed through a modern lens, Patrick Lussier’s Dracula 2000 starred Gerard Butler as Vlad the Impaler in a modern setting, complete with a nu-metal soundtrack and frosted tips galore. Despite being heavily marketed on the back of Wes Craven’s involvement as an executive producer, it was nothing short of an unmitigated disaster.

To complement a dismal Rotten Tomatoes score of 17 percent, Dracula 2000 failed to recoup its substantial $54 million budget at the box office, and was forgotten just as quickly as it arrived. That being said, if you break the conclusion down to its core parts, then it ranks as one of the finest finales to any flick focusing on the Transylvanian native there’s ever been.

As it transpires, Dracula’s real identity is none other than that of Judas Iscariot, who was condemned to spend eternity afflicted with vampirism for betraying Jesus before committing the sin of suicide. In addition, his hatred of crosses and silver instantly make complete contextual sense for biblical reasons for being tied directly to the crucifixion, planting the mythos in an entirely different set of circumstances.

Sadly, the film as a whole is irredeemably terrible, but the ending alone almost makes it worth tracking down for its sheer balls to the wall bravura.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of Scott Campbell
Scott Campbell
News, reviews, interviews. To paraphrase Keanu Reeves: Words. Lots of words.