Fans Open a Can of Worms by Debating What Should Come Next for Hulk
Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.
she-hulk hulk
via Marvel Studios

Fans open a can of legal worms by debating what should come next for Hulk

It's like he was made for this.

The Hulk may be able to smash practically anything, but he can’t break free of the legal arrangement between Disney and Universal that’s put the kibosh on any future solo movies.

Recommended Videos

After 2003’s Hulk, Universal didn’t put a sequel into production, and the character rights soon reverted to Marvel Studios. Kevin Feige can theoretically make a big green blockbuster at any time he chooses, though the twist is that Universal has the right of first refusal on distributing it, and Disney is hardly keen on splitting those juicy profits.

This means Mark Ruffalo’s Hulk is trapped as a perpetual supporting character, with his MCU arc taking place in the background of films like Thor: Ragnarok, Avengers: Infinity War and Endgame, and soon She-Hulk: Attorney at Law on Disney Plus.

However, fans on r/MarvelStudios now think it’s time for the not-so-jolly green giant to step back into the spotlight. A thread fantasizes about a World War Hulk movie, loosely adapting the cataclysmic plot arc that saw the justifiably furious short shorts enthusiast squaring off against the Marvel universe. The starting point would be Liv Tyler’s Betty Ross returning, followed shortly by her death. This brings back ‘rage’ Hulk, and away we go.

Replies point out that right now, the MCU doesn’t have the heavy hitters needed to make this work, with Tony Stark’s absence creating a difficult-to-fill hole in the story. Others say that using the death of a woman as the motivation for a male-led story is classic fridging, and would be a contrived way to start the conflict.

There are rumors that 2024 will see the Hulk rights revert to Marvel in their entirety, freeing them up to finally put a capper on the story of Ruffalo’s Bruce Banner and his alter-ego. But with the actor apparently happy to keep going, not to mention the CGI nature of the character meaning he doesn’t age, we like him as one of the few remaining heroes from Phase 1.

Either way, we’ll be seeing Hulk back in action very soon when She-Hulk: Attorney at Law lands on Disney Plus on August 17.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy
Author
Image of David James
David James
I'm a writer/editor who's been at the site since 2015. I cover politics, weird history, video games and... well, anything really. Keep it breezy, keep it light, keep it straightforward.