Forgot password
Enter the email address you used when you joined and we'll send you instructions to reset your password.
If you used Apple or Google to create your account, this process will create a password for your existing account.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Reset password instructions sent. If you have an account with us, you will receive an email within a few minutes.
Something went wrong. Try again or contact support if the problem persists.

Groot Wasn’t Always Going To Be A Baby In Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 2

Marvel Studios never expected Baby Groot to be so massively popular. Following his brief appearance at the end of Guardians of the Galaxy back in 2014, they were suddenly met with a huge demand for toys and merchandise based on the character, and while some followed, they really missed a trick by not getting the goods into stores sooner.
This article is over 7 years old and may contain outdated information

Marvel Studios never expected Baby Groot to be so massively popular. Following his brief appearance at the end of Guardians of the Galaxy back in 2014, they were suddenly met with a huge demand for toys and merchandise based on the character, and while some followed, they really missed a trick by not getting the goods into stores sooner.

Recommended Videos

Of course, to do so would have ruined a huge moment in the movie, but with Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 putting the adorable Baby Groot at the forefront of its marketing campaign, moviegoers have fallen in love with him and will be happily splashing the cash in a couple of months from now on everything from Funko Pops to plush toys.

However, things could have been very, very different. In a recent interview, James Gunn confirmed that he didn’t initially consider including Baby Groot in the sequel and that he originally envisioned him being back to his old self by the time Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 begins.

“A hundred percent, I started out thinking of him as full grown, and I didn’t have him grow up. Then all of a sudden I thought, ‘that’s what [fans] would think [we] would do, and I really don’t have to stick with that.’ “It could be baby Groot, and baby Groot is very different. He’s a unique little fella, and he’s pretty great in the movie even though he’s not even [physically] there [on set].

Continuing on, Gunn mentioned that in the sequel, Baby Groot will be a bit of a jerk, and an idiot:

But all the time Chris [Pratt, Star-Lord] is like ‘G-d dammit, he’s gonna steal the f***ing movie.’ And it’s nothing. It’s nothing there, but he’s funny even in the dailies we’re watching. And we got the guy on a stick, and people are laughing! There’s something really cool about him, and he’s funny in the movie. He’s a little jerk too. He can kick some ass… he’s also an idiot. He’s a baby, he’s not very smart.”

It’s hard not to wonder if Marvel might have pushed Gunn to keep Baby Groot because of the merchandise possibilities (you just know that he’s going to be in every single Disney Store this summer), but what the director says here is still quite interesting.

What do you think about Gunn’s Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 comments? As always, sound off with your thoughts in the comments section down below.


We Got This Covered is supported by our audience. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn a small affiliate commission. Learn more about our Affiliate Policy